if you're using E2020 like me the answer would be
D) "SHS from units or common areas where smoking occurs can seep into smokefree units.”
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
I think c but just take a guess on what u think
A. The central bank
A central bank, also known as either a reserve bank or a monetary authority is what controls the the nation's money supply. It also manages a state's currency, interest rates and usually the commercial banking system as well.
Answer:
<em>Legislative Process
</em>
Explanation:
In the United States. Congress, either the House of Representatives or the Senate initiates legislation. Nevertheless, revenue, budgets and tax bills will come from the Senate.
Assuming that a member of the House of Representatives has an idea for a new rule. He or she is drafting the bill and becoming the bill's chief sponsor. Then a number is allocated to the bill that is valid for the current Congress session (two years) and then adopted.
Any legislation that was not approved and adopted by Congress at the end of the second session, "dies" and must be reintroduced at the next Congress.
