1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrMuchimi
3 years ago
14

Please help me ASAP ​

History
1 answer:
Svetllana [295]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Hey crystal!

Explanation:

Therefore, so that dangerous ideas such as Liberalism and Nationalism didn’t spread and the Austrian multi-national empire was maintained the powers signed the Vienna settlement, removing French influence & constitutions and restoring the legitimate rulers. Many Italians were unhappy with this and called for a united Italy.

One Italian who’s idea it was to have a Liberal Italian republic was Giuseppe Mazzini.  

Although unsuccessful in his conspiracies, Mazzini succeeded in igniting a feeling of nationalism in the people of the Italian states. In Marseille 1831, Giuseppe Mazzini founded the “Young Italy” group. Through “Young Italy” and the thousands of articles, which Mazzini wrote, smuggled into Italy and published in young Italy's newspaper or elsewhere, Mazzini publicised his ideas of Liberalism and Nationalism.  

He is therefore seen as a key to Italian unification because as Denis Mack Smith says, Mazzini succeeded in “defining the goal and arousing enthusiasm among practiced soldiers and statesmen” who were important to his cause.  

Mazzini's contribution to unite Italy is not through revolts, which he also attempted such as in 1834 where he tried to invade Savoy from Switzerland; his contribution is that he fabricated the idea of a united Italy.  

Mazzini who, after 1830, was forced to live in exile became the ideological head of a nationalist movement. He also founded societies such as “Young Germany” or “Young Europe” through which his fame grew.  

As one of the supporters of the “Risorgimento” Mazzini saw his aim to be the creation of a liberal country. Therefore the poem by George Meredith quite rightly identifies Mazzini as the soul of the movement to unite Italy. He was the ideological leader and gave people a reason to fight for. Mazzini opposing constitutional monarchs was repaired to Milan in 1848 where he conducted the paper “L'Italia del Popolo“, where, when Charles Albert turned his back on the city, the inhabitants turned to Mazzini to become dictator.  

This shows that Mazzini’s contribution towards the unity of Italy was psychological, through his ideological ideas and the enthusiasm, which he ignited in the people. He managed to excite the people for a united liberal republic and gave them an aim. Mazzini was also important to the unification of Italy because he in a sense made Garibaldi, by Garibaldi joining “Young Italy” at the age of 15. Lastly Mazzini by founding “Young Italy” gave a stage to all those who wanted a unified Italy.

Garibaldi who after the age of 15 joined “Young Italy” had a crewed idea of politics but saw it desirable to have a unified Italy. He preferred a Republic but would have accepted a monarch as well.  

With his skills he was able to take 1000 men, down to Marsala in 1860 and take over Sicily. He then moved across to Naples where he met barely any resistance. Garibaldi and his men then moved up into the Papal states where he met the men of King Emmanuel II, to whom he gave the land he had conquered.  

Through conquering the Kingdom of two Sicilies and handing them over to Piedmont, Garibaldi was the decisive factor in the unification of Italy. He managed to halt the formation of a bi-polar Italy with a Piedmontese empire in the North and a Kingdom of two Sicilies in the South only divided by the Papal States, which would have then only through war be unifiable. However Garibaldi not only annexed Southern Italy for Piedmont but he also created a cult.  

The last architect of a unified Italy and at the same time the only who never intended to unify Italy was Camillo Cavour. It is debatable whether he worked towards a unified Italy Italian historians suggest that he did, while other historian such as Mack Smith in his book “Cavour and Garibaldi” state the opposite.  

Cavour’s main aim was to expand the Piedmontese territory and annex other states and so increase the influence of Piedmont. By doing this he contributed towards unifying Italy because he decreased the number of independent states. Cavour secretly planned a war with Austria by persuading Napoleon III to a pact against Austria.  

Cavour is seen as the brain of Italian unification as arranged the circumstances for the unification. However his possibly greatest contribution was that he sent King Victor Emmanuel II to intercept Garibaldi in the Papal States. Cavour fearing that Garibaldi could attack the French troops stationed in Rome and therefore cause French troops to invade Piedmont sent King Victor Emmanuel II to meet Garibaldi. Garibaldi unexpectedly handed over the states he had conquered. Due to his cunning political contrivances Cavour was extremely important for the unification of Italy.

You might be interested in
How did Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign connect with the history of American freedom
Anon25 [30]
He was the first black president.
4 0
3 years ago
What type of money did the greenback party recommend?
Arte-miy333 [17]
They recommended paper Money. I love ur name btw!
6 0
3 years ago
Sections of Texas Map
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

Explanation:

Big Bend National Park is located in the southwestern part of Texas along the Texas-Mexico border. Big Bend was established as a national park in June of 1935, preserving the largest tracts of Chihuahuan Desert topography and ecology in the United States.

I do hope I helped you! :)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the British Parliament respond to the colonists' opposition to the Stamp Act and boycott of English goods?
dimaraw [331]
The British Parliament responded to the colonists' opposition by repealing the state act.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the differences between Eurpopean and Native American attitudes toward land useand land ownership.?
Tresset [83]
The Native Americans had the idea that you couldn't own land, it belonged to the gods. Native Americans also had the idea of "Communalism" which is the idea that everything in the tribe could be used by the tribe. The Europeans had been owning land and purchasing it for private use for centuries and had a deep culture of land ownership dating well past the middle ages. 
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • if heat energy is added to a solid like ice, it will begin to melt, what happens to the water molecules in an ice cube as it mel
    7·1 answer
  • In what ways can a foreign person enter the United States?
    6·1 answer
  • How long did Chinese rule of Vietnam last?
    10·1 answer
  • What does gordimer express about south african society by giving details in these lines about the attitudes of the housemaid and
    7·1 answer
  • Why did people in 1999 believe the world was going to end in the next century?
    5·1 answer
  • Which aspect of English government traditions did not influence leaders in the United States
    5·2 answers
  • Who was carpet baggers
    9·1 answer
  • How did European trade in west Africa change over the course of the nineteenth century
    15·1 answer
  • Using the chart above, you could represent the information given about car sales in 2007 with a pictograph Please select the bes
    12·1 answer
  • What was transcendentalism?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!