I believe the answer you're looking for is 30% or 3/10
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I cannot use the line tool for you, but I can rewrite the equations
y = -x + 4 is good enough
Two points for this graph:
x = 0 -> y = 4 gives the point (0, 4)
x = 1 -> y = 3 gives the point (1, 3)
18x + 6y = -6
6y = -18x - 6
y = -3x - 2
Two ponts for this graph:
x = 0 -> y = -2 gives the point (0, -2)
x = 1 -> y = -5 gives the point (1, -5 )
Plan A: 30 + 0.01m
Plan B: 20 + 0.05m
in order for 2 plans cost the same, both need to be equal
so should be
20 + 0.05m = 30 + 0.01m
answer is D. last one
20 + 0.05m = 30 + 0.01m
Answer:
The requirements for the hypothesis test does satisfied the method for testing the claim that from two population proportions the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine.
Step-by-step explanation:
The percentage of children in the treatment group was:
(201229/401974)*100 = 49.9%
The percentage of children given placebo was:
(200745/401974)*100 = 50.1%
The percentage of children that developed polio in the treatment group:
(33/200745)*100 = 0.0164%
The percentage of children that developed polio in the placebo group:
(115/201229)*100 = 0.0571%
The percentage difference between the two group:
((0.0571-0.0164)/0.0571) = 61.62%
Therefore:
The amount of children used for each group was almost divided into half of the total amount of children. The test revealed although very small percentages of the both group developed polio, 68.62% more children given placebo than the children that was given the salk vaccine. Therefore, the study shows that the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine and the the hypthesis test is satisfied.
