Answer: An I- statement has three parts
Nullification, in United States constitutional history, is a legal theory that a state has the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal law which that state has deemed unconstitutional. So the best answer among the following choices is letter C. Southern senator Calhoun and Hayne argued that Congress could not pass laws that favored one region of the country over another.
A good economic strategy for an area with tropical weather but few skilled workers would be an economic strategy with a focus on developing education and a technology sector, because this will help the employment of the workers, while give the time to prepare the next workforce into new market that could expand the economy even more.
The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
a) Based on your understanding of critical thinking and memory, describe one flaw in Bruce's reasoning.
I consider that the problem Brice has is biased. It is not the professor's fault. The exam is well designed. The issue is the way Bruce is studying. Bruce can read four or five more times the questions, but if he does not understand the questions, the answers will never be correct. If he is not understanding, what he memorizes won't be correct.
B) Describe two possible explanations for Bruce's average performance.
Number one, he is not getting the right ideas of the question. If he is just memorizing the concepts, his brain maybe is not getting enough time to remember them at the moment of the examination.
The other issue is that he could believe that what he is understanding is correct, but his knowledge is limited to what he thinks is correct. This does not mean that he indeed has the right answers.
Answer:
The correct answer is B.bargain in order to obtain the property rights of the gopher habitat.
Explanation:
In economics, the Coase Theorem states that in a market where transaction costs are negligible, a dispute between parties where property rights are involved will lead to a bargaining process where the party that gives the most value to whatever it's in dispute will end up winning rights over that property. In this case, the environmental group assigns great value to protecting the habitat of the Wyoming pocker gopher, but they can only fully secure its well-being by securing property rights over said habitat, and given their standing, they can expect to bargain or negotiate successfully. Any other option, like protesting, boycotting, or lobbying, won't be good enough to achieve their goals.
