Answer: Under the federal system, the final authority is the constitution.
Explanation:
<span>These experiences are not limited to one brain pathway, but several. The ability for us to recognize faces is but one part of our overall experience, and shows that there are many systems that interact when performing even the simplest of tasks.</span>
Answer:
Takings Clause
Explanation:
The takings clause stated that the Government cannot acquire ownership toward a privately held properties without giving the original owner with proper compensation for that properties.
This can be seen in the example above.
The government wanted to acquire land which owned by Bill. If the government want to use its legal power to take it, the takings clause required the government to convert the land to its current market value and provide compensation with that amount as a minimum to the original owner (in this case, Bill)
Homesteaders living on the great plains were what you call "Extremely Dramatic". There were lots of conditions on the great plains that affected settlers lives. Here are these problems; building houses, staying healthy, extreme weather, lack of fuel, Indian Attacks, lack of isolation, keeping clean, lack of water, and pests and vermin. The problem with the bugs were grasshoppers. Grasshoppers ruined their crops. Building houses from wood was expensive. The settlers couldn't afford building houses from wood, so they built it from sod. The walls and floors were infested with bugs and lice, because these homes were built from dirt and grass. It would leak in the homes when it rained. They also had problems staying healthy because of the insects. The insects that flew around would inject disease into their bodies. In other words, There are three things that helped them survive, and 3/3 of these examples issued technology. 1.) Barbed wire, 2.) steel plow, and 3.) windmills. The barbed wire was for housing reasons, the steel plow was for cutting through tough prairie sod, and the windmills for pumping water out of the ground. :)
Answer:
A) judging, criticizing, and placing blame.
Explanation:
First of all, the social worker is not even considering the possibility that Andrew could have been fired without justification, or that he could get his job back, he is placing blame exclussively on the worker (Andrew).
Besides, he is judging Andrew as an alcoholic, or at least, as a person who has serious problems with alcohol consumption (so serious to the point of going to work drunk and being fired because of that), and finally, the social worker is criticizing the way Andrew is dealing with his possible alcoholism, because he is telling Andrew that he is not even Aware of what alcohol is doing to him.
