All categories

3 years ago

Drag and drop a reason to each box to complete the proof ?

Mathematics

1 answer:

den301095 [7]3 years ago

4 0

1. Vertical angles are congruent: a) we're proving that two angles are congruent (we use ≅), and it just happens that those two angles are vertical (opposite angles on two intersecting lines).

2. SAS congruence: It is one of the last three, since we're trying to prove the triangles' congruence, and it is SAS, because our given gives us two pairs of congruent lines, and we find that the angle between them are congruent.

You might be interested in

Josh $600 into an account that pays simple interest at a rate of 4% per year. How much interest will he be paid in the first 4 y

galben [10]

Answer:

i think its 96 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

600 × .06 = 24

24 × 4 = 96

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find the domain and range X+ | X |

Lesechka [4]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

domain: all real numbers, (-∞, ∞)
range: all non-negative numbers, [0, ∞)

Step-by-step explanation:

There are no values of x for which this expression is undefined. The domain is all real numbers.

The minimum value of this expression is 0. There is no maximum value. The range is all numbers greater than or equal to zero.

4 0

3 years ago

SECTION C

ki77a [65]

Sus hahah shshsh dish

7 0

3 years ago

3⁴-21÷7 use pemdas. to solve this

9966 [12]

3⁴-21÷7

According to PEMDAS ( order of operations):

First, Do exponents before multiplying or dividing: 3^4

81-21÷7

Then, divide before subtracting (27÷7 )

81- 3

Finally, subtract

8 0

1 year ago

- According to CTIA.org, there were 327.6 million cell phones in the U.S. in 2014. The U.S. population was approximately 317.9 m

topjm [15]

Answer:

1.03

Step-by-step explanation:

Per capita just means per unit of population, or per person. This question is asking how many cell phones there were in the United States per person in 2014. We can use simple division to determine that the answer is 327.6/317.9 or about 1.03 when rounded to the nearest hundredth.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers