If you divide them you get 0.1
SAS. Sides because PN and MN are congruent as well as RN and QN. Since angle PNQ and angle MNR are vertical angles they are also congruent.
42 - 6 = 36 - 1
36 - 6 = 30 - 2
30 - 6 = 24 - 3
24 - 6 = 18 - 4
18 - 6 = 12 - 5
12 - 6 = 6 - 6
6 - 6 = 0 - 7
42/6 = 7
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
In this question, you roll 3 from the standard die and then add it with the next roll to see if the sums are greater than 4.
From this explanation you can see that you use the result from your first roll for the second event, so we can conclude that the event is dependent.
Imagine if we change the result of the first roll into 5, without adding the second roll we can know that the sum will be greater than 4. The first event result will influence the second event, so it is a dependent event.
Based on dimensional analysis and unit conversion theory we conclude that an area of 359 square inches is equivalent to an area of 2.5 square feet.
<h3>How to apply dimensional analysis in unit conversion</h3>
In this question we need to convert a magnitude in a given unit to an <em>equivalent</em> magnitude with another unit. According to dimensional analysis, <em>unit</em> conversions are represented by the following expression:
y = A · x (1)
Where:
- x - Original magnitude, in square inches.
- y - Resulting magnitude, in square feet.
- A - Conversion factor, in square feet per square inch.
Dimensionally speaking, area is equal to the product of length and length:
[Area] = [Length] × [Length]
And a feet is equivalent to 12 inches. Now we proceed to convert the magnitude to square feet:
x = 359 in² × (1 ft/12 in) × (1 ft/12 in)
x = 359 in² × (1 ft²/144 in²)
x = 2.5 ft²
Based on dimensional analysis and unit conversion theory we conclude that an area of 359 square inches is equivalent to an area of 2.5 square feet.
To learn more on unit conversions: brainly.com/question/11795061
#SPJ1
