Kersaint and Saint-Maurice's arguments were different from that of the nationalists because:
- The nationalists argued that only the people that were born in the nation and had a shared history were to be regarded as citizens within the country.
<h3>Who were the nationalists?</h3>
These group of people were those that were regarded as the free men of color. They wanted a country were people would be free and have same rights.
The country of Haiti was under the colonization of the French at the time. Kersaints wanted the black to have their freedom only after they had met with certain conditions.
Saint Maurice on the other hand wanted the people to have equal rights and freedom . He wanted a situation where no body would be under the mercy of another.
Read more on Saint Dominique here:
brainly.com/question/6169880?referrer=searchResults
The Hammurabi Code is probably best known in popular knowledge through the phrase "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth".
As the name implies, this was based on the idea that for every crime you commit, a punishment of equal severity would await you, in this sense you would knew what to expect for a certain illegal/bad deed that you have done.
A group of Barons were taxed by the king of England before the Magna Carta. The basis of Magna Carta was to stop the misrule of the king of England and also to stop the excessive taxation that the Barons had to face. I hope that this is the answer you were looking for and it has come to your help.
To Americans, the history includes both treating Native American tribes as equals and exiling them from their homes. The new U.S. government was thus free to acquire Native American lands by treaty or force. Resistance from the tribes stopped the encroachment of settlers, at least for a while
1. Mayflower
2. Common sense
3.bill of rights
4.manga carta
