1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
FrozenT [24]
3 years ago
10

The National Weather Service keeps track of the temperature for a given day in a given city. It also keeps track of this informa

tion at certain times during a given day. The following temperatures were recorded on a January day in New York City.Time of Day10 AM12 Noon2 PM4 PM6 PM8 PM10 PMTemperature (F)30353636343028Over which period(s) of time is the average rate of change zero? What, if anything, can you conclude about the actual temperature fluctuation within this period?a.The average rate of change of temperature is 0 from 2 PM to 4 PM; Nothing can be concluded about the actual temperature fluctuation.b.The average rate of change of temperature is 0 from 2 PM to 4 PM and also from 10 AM to 8 PM; Nothing can be concluded about the actual temperature fluctuation.c.The average rate of change of temperature is 0 from 10 AM to 8 PM; Nothing can be concluded about the actual temperature fluctuation.d.The average rate of change of temperature is 0 from 2 PM to 4 PM and also from 10 AM to 8 PM; The conclusion that can be drawn is that the temperature will not change for that time period.
Mathematics
2 answers:
vlada-n [284]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: The average rate of change of temperature is 0 from 2 PM to 4 PM; Nothing can be concluded about the actual temperature fluctuation.

Step-by-step explanation: because from 10 to 8 the change of temperature has change within the hours

8090 [49]3 years ago
5 0
The correct answer for this question is: The <span>period(s) of time where the average rate of changes to zero is </span>"b.The average rate of change of temperature is 0 from 2 PM to 4 PM and also from 10 AM to 8 PM; Nothing can be concluded about the actual temperature fluctuation."
You might be interested in
Find the perimeter of the triangle in inches.
madam [21]

Answer:

58 inches

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

Perimeter means the sum of length of all sides of a figure.

So, the perimeter of this triangle would also be the sum of the length of its sides.

It has 3 sides.

19 in, 16 in and 23 in.

So, its perimeter equals 19 + 16+ 23

which equals 58 inches!

So, the perimeter would be 58 inches.!

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Solve for x<br> -6x+14&lt; -28 or 9x+15≤−12
Free_Kalibri [48]

- 3 \geqslant x > 6

Step-by-step explanation:

....

8 0
3 years ago
The home run percentage is the number of home runs per 100 times at bat. A random sample of 43 professional baseball players gav
Andru [333]

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) Yes, if you enter all 43 values into your calculator, you calculator should report:

xbar = 2.293

s = 1.401

(b)

Note: Most professors say that is sigma = the population standard deviation is unknown (as it is unknown here), you should construct a t-confidence interval.

xbar +/- t * s / sqrt(n)

2.293 - 1.684 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 1.933

2.293 - 1.684 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 2.653

Answer: (1.933, 2.653)

Note: To find the t-value that allows us to be 90% confident, go across from df = 43-1 = 42 (round down to 40 to be conservative since 42 in not in the table) and down from (1-.90)/2 = .05 or up from 90% depending on your t-table. So, the t-critical value is 1.684.

Note: If you can use the TI-83/84, it will construct the following CI using df = 42 (ie t = 1.681).

2.293 +/- 1.681 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)

(1.934, 2.652)

Note: Some professors want you to construct a z-CI when the sample size is large. If your professor says this, the correct 90% CI is:

2.293 +/- 1.645 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)

(1.942, 2.644)

Note: To find the z-value that allows us to be 90% confident, (1) using the z-table, look up (1-.90)/2 = .05 inside the z-table, or (2) using the t-table, go across from infinity df (= z-values) and down from .05 or up from 90% depending on your t-table. Either way, the z-critical value is 1.645.

(c)

Note: Again, most professors say that is sigma = the population standard deviation is unknown (as it is unknown here), you should construct a t-confidence interval.

xbar +/- t * s / sqrt(n)

2.293 - 2.704 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 1.715

2.293 - 2.704 * 1.401 / sqrt(43) = 2.871

Answer: (1.715, 2.871)

Note: To find the t-value that allows us to be 99% confident, go across from df = 43-1 = 42 (round down to 40 to be conservative since 42 in not in the table) and down from (1-.99)/2 = .005 or up from 99% depending on your t-table. So, the t-critical value is 2.704.

Note: If you can use the TI-83/84, it will construct the following CI using df = 42 (ie t = 2.698).

2.293 +/- 2.698 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)

(1.717, 2.869)

Note: Again, some professors want you to construct a z-CI when the sample size is large. If your professor says this, the correct 99% CI is:

2.293 +/- 2.576 * 1.401 / sqrt(43)

(1.742, 2.843)

Note: To find the z-value that allows us to be 99% confident, (1) using the z-table, look up (1-.99)/2 = .005 inside the z-table, or (2) using the t-table, go across from infinity df (= z-values) and down from .005 or up from 99% depending on your t-table. Either way, the z-critical value is 2.576.

(d)

Tim Huelett 2.5

Since 2.5 falls between (1.715, 2.871), we see that Tim Huelett falls in the 99% CI range. So, his home run percentage is NOT significantly different than the population average.

Herb Hunter 2.0

Since 2.0 falls between (1.715, 2.871), we see that Herb Hunter falls in the 99% CI range. So, his home run percentage is NOT significantly different than the population average.

Jackie Jensen 3.8.

Since 3.8 falls above (1.715, 2.871), we see that Jackie Jensen falls in the 99% CI range. So, his home run percentage IS significantly GREATER than the population average.

(e)

Because of the Central Limit Theorem (CLT), since our sample size is large, we do NOT have to make the normality assumption since the CLT tells us that the sampling distribution of xbar will be approximatley normal even if the underlying population distribution is not.

6 0
2 years ago
What number would complete the pattern below? 66 73 13 21 52 __ 10 20
Serhud [2]
The answer is d.61. 66+7=73. 13+8=21. 52+9=61. 10+10=20
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Book costs $5.25 plus sales tax. After sales tax, the book is $5.58. What is the sales tax rate?
Karolina [17]
5,25-5,58=0,33

The answer is $0,33
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Mr. Sullivan places tiles numbered 1 through 18 in a bag and assigns a number to represent each of the 18 students in his class.
    6·1 answer
  • Starting at the top of a square pyramid and make a vertical slice cutting pyramid in half what is the shape of the newly-exposed
    5·1 answer
  • Evaluate 3(x+4)(x+1)<br> (x+2)(x-2) for x=4​
    10·2 answers
  • Misha measured a distance of 60 feet from her kitchen to the bedroom. What is the equivalent number of meters.
    10·1 answer
  • Which calculation can be used to find the length of AC?
    11·1 answer
  • A/b=c for b please help
    11·1 answer
  • I need help what is the answer will mark brainliest please help
    15·1 answer
  • Please answer this question correctly
    6·1 answer
  • Please answer I will mark brainliest​
    14·2 answers
  • What is the probability of<br> spinning a C?<br> В В<br> A В<br> [?]%<br> СА<br> СС
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!