1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisabon 2012 [21]
3 years ago
13

What is -15.5t + 13.24 = -13.44 + 10.56 – 3.1t

Mathematics
2 answers:
Ivan3 years ago
5 0
I hope this helps you

Tatiana [17]3 years ago
4 0
First, subtract 13.24 from both sides of the equation and add -3.1t on both sides of the equation. This isolates the variable t:

-15.5t + 3.1t = -13.44 + 10.56 - 13.24

Now combine the numbers on both sides of the equation and solve for t:

-12.4t = -16. 12
       t =  1.3

Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
A basketball player gets 2 free-throw shots when she is fouled by a player on the opposing team. She misses the first shot 40% o
yan [13]
<span>The probability of missing the first shot is 40%. When she misses the first shot, the probability of missing the second shot is very, very low, only 5%. That means that the probability of missing both shots must be much smaller than the probability of missing the first shot.
 
40/100 * 5/100
0.4 * 0.05
= 0.02
= 2%</span>
5 0
3 years ago
The difference of the product of a number, y, and 3 and 24 is 237. Write an equation
lbvjy [14]

y + 3 +24 = 237

y + 27 = 237

y + 27 - 27 = 237 -27

y = 210

5 0
3 years ago
Tell which property the statement x+14=14+x illustrates.
Naddik [55]

Answer:associative property of addition

Step-by-step explanation:The associative property of addition says that changing the grouping of the addends does not change the sum.

8 0
2 years ago
True or False?: To make a sketch of any rational function whose numerator is a number and whose denominator is a factored polyno
sergejj [24]
The question is for any rational function. I give one example in picture below. There we can see that first part of the "rule" is true. we indeed have vertical asymptotes at every x value where denominator is zero in this case x = 3 and x = 1. but second part of the rule is not true. we can see that if we inverse x ( we have factor that looks like a - x we get positive function between asymptotes.

Answer is False

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which graph shows this system of equations?
SashulF [63]

Answer:

I believe it is B tell me if I am wrong please

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A girl has 8 coins in dimes and quarters. Their value is $1.55. How many quarters does she have?
    13·2 answers
  • Help me! Mathematics, quick, I'm on Time Limit!<br><br> Thank you all very much!
    11·2 answers
  • Gordan's front lawn measures 2,655 square feet. It takes him 9 minutes to mow it on his riding lawn mower. How many square feet
    14·2 answers
  • graph the solution to the following system of inequalities y&lt;-2x+7, y greater than or equal to 2x - 3 ​
    5·1 answer
  • Is 1/7 bigger than 1/4?
    15·1 answer
  • Solve using elimination. <br> 10x + y = -19 <br> 10x + 3y = -17
    10·2 answers
  • Which expression is equivalent to 7/32 + 2/32
    11·2 answers
  • (125,75)-(40,72) işleminin sonucunu bulunuz​
    14·1 answer
  • What is the volume of the prism? m 14 m 6 m 8 m​
    9·2 answers
  • Deena took six final exams and received these scores:<br> 65, 72, 79, 86, 93, 100.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!