Educated guess: I'd say you still definitely have a good chance but you should look to prove yourself. Like, get good good(high) scores on your SAT/ ACT tests. A high score on those should give you better chances
Answer:
Thoreau's Civil Disobedience upholds the need to organize one's still, small voice over the directs of laws. It censures American social organizations and strategies, most unmistakably servitude and the Mexican-American War.
Explanation:
Thoreau's Civil Disobedience upholds the need to organize one's still, small voice over the directs of laws. It censures American social organizations and strategies, most unmistakably servitude and the Mexican-American War.
Thoreau starts Civil Disobedience by saying that he concurs with the aphorism, "That government is best which governs least." Indeed, he says, men will sometime have the option to have an administration that doesn't administer by any means. All things considered, government seldom demonstrates valuable or proficient.
Monologue means a long and typically tedious speech by one person during a conversation, while soliloquy means the act of speaking one's thoughts aloud when by oneself or regardless of any hearers. A soliloquy is a character making a speech, usually when alone. ... That means the character can hear himself speak.
International law defines genocide in terms of violence committed “with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group,” yet this approach fails to acknowledge the full impacts of cultural destruction. There is insufficient international discussion of “cultural genocide,” which is a particular threat to the world's indigenous minorities. Despite the recent adoption of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which acknowledges the rights to culture, diversity, and self-determination, claims of cultural genocide are often derided, and their indicators dismissed as benign effects of modernity and indigenous cultural diffusion. This article considers the destruction of indigenous cultures and the forced assimilation of indigenous peoples through the analytical lens of genocide. Two case studies—the federally unrecognized Winnemem Wintu tribe in northern California and the Inuit of northern Canada—are highlighted as illustrative examples of groups facing these challenges. Ultimately, this article seeks to prompt serious discussion of cultural rights violations, which often do not involve direct physical killing or violence, and consideration of the concept “cultural genocide” as a tool for human rights promotion and protection.