In the Declaration of Independence, one opposing claim Jefferson anticipates is that prudence would "dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes". Indeed, he says, and experience demonstrates that mankind would take all of the suffers, as long they are bearable, before changing the Government to which they are used to. But when a long trail of abuses and usurpations makes that Government despotic and not the system that guarantees the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, it is the duty of men to take down that government and establish a new one that guarantees those rights. And so he lists the abuses that the King's ruling has inflicted upon the colonies, such as imposing taxes, cutting off their trade, dissolving Representatives Houses when it didn't follow his wishes, and not re-establishing them after a long time, etc.
Jefferson is trying to demonstrate why it is fair and justifiable that the colonies break free from the English ruling after it didn't stop with its tyrannical actions towards them, when the colonists has petitioned it in the most humble way. If the civilized and lawful approaches weren't enough to reform the regime, then it is fair to take it down and build a new one.
Answer:
The Compromise of 1850 was made up of five bills that ... for his work on the Missouri Compromise, was the primary creator of the Missouri Compromise.
The act was meant to ensure freedom of religion for Christian settlers of diverse persuasions in the colony. ... Maryland was settled by George Calvert, Lord Baltimore, who was a Roman Catholic, so the law has sometimes been interpreted as a means of providing Roman Catholics with religious freedom.
Elizabeth Schuyler Hamiltion
Answer:
military power should be available for retaliation if necessary
Explanation:
The speak softly and carry a big stick is the approach use by the then <u>American President</u>,<em>Theodore Roosevelt</em> to approach its foreign policy with negotiation first, and if this fails,he resorted to the military attacks on the <em>foreign soil</em>.
He always find ways to resolve the foreign policy without the <em>intervention</em> of the <em>American standby military</em> that is ready to attack at any time.
