Answer:
B. Persons on fixed incomes.
Explanation:
Inflation is a general increase in prices and fall in the purchasing value of money, therefore, a person with a fixed income will not be affected.
Answer:
-$1,562.50
Explanation:
Calculation to determine The highest net profit possible for the speculator based
Premium of the option = $.05 per unit * (31,250 units)
Premium of the option= -$1,562.50
Therefore Based on the information given and the above calculation The HIGHEST NET PROFIT that will be possible for the speculator will be -$1,562.50
For the answer to the question above, I think the answer is because they want <em><u>"</u></em><u><em> to</em></u><u><em> </em></u><span><u><em>reduce their employment risk; increase the company's value" </em></u>that's why they want to diversify</span>
I hope my answer helped you. Have a nice day!
Answer:
The investor will prefer asset U. So the correct answer is option D
Explanation:
To choose between these stocks, we will calculate the coefficient of variation (CV) which is used to assess the risk per unit of expected return. As most people are risk averse, we assume that the investor is risk averse. We will calculate the CV for all three investments and the stock having lowest CV will be selected.
<u>Coefficient of Variation (CV)</u>
Coefficient of Variation = standard deviation / expected return
<u />
Asset Q = 5.5% / 6.5% = 0.846
Asset U = 5.5% / 8.8% = 0.625
Asset B = 6.5% / 8.8% = 0.738
Thus, asset U has the lowest CV and the investor =, being a risk averse, will prefer asset U.
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
Trademark infringement refers to the violation of the exclusive privileges assigned to a trademark without including the permission of the trademark owner and any licensee Violation that arise when one person, the "infringer," uses a trademark that is equivalent or ambiguously related to a trademark used by some other group in connection to goods or services that are equivalent or identical to the goods or services.
Where the corresponding marks and products are wholly different, violation of the trademark could still be identified if the recorded label is well recognized under the Paris Agreement. In the U.s a cause of litigation is termed trademark dilution with the use of a label for such significantly different facilities.