Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that as a consequence, her daughter is most likely to display signs of insecure attachment. This refers to a type of relationship in which the child's bond with the parent is shrouded by fear, usually caused when the parent rejects the child from an early stage in childhood. Which is exactly what Marissa is doing to her child.
Resources can broadly be classified upon their availability—they are classified into renewable and non-renewable resources. Examples of non-renewable resources are coal, crude oil natural gas nuclear energy, etc. ... An item becomes a resource with time and developing technology.
