The correct answer is B. Monetary gift
Explanation:
Monetary gift is a type of donation that involves transferring or giving money to an individual, a group of people, or an organization. This often means they can decide how to spend the money. Also, this differs from other types of donations such as donations of goods because this involves donating specific things such as food, clothes, or furniture; or from the donation of work/services because in this you give your time, skills, and effort.
A monetary gift is the type of donation the Social Concerns Committee made to the women's shelter because the committee gave this organization a check, which is equivalent to money. Also, to get the money they requested people to donate goods they later sold but in the end what the women's shelter receive was money.
Answer:
According to the Great Compromise, representation in the House of Representatives would be based on each state's population and every state would have two senators.
Explanation:
The Connecticut Compromise of 1787 in the United States, also known as the Great Compromise, was created to resolve the issue of representation that emerged in the creation of legislative bodies. It merged the Virginia Plan that favored population-based representation, and the New Jersey Plan, which listed each state as an equal. It established a bicameral system: one chamber in favor of the Plan of Virginia, based on the population of the States, and the other according to the Plan of New Jersey, by which all the States voted in equality.
Answer:
961,121 people
Explanation:
they gata build the wall to stop them.
Answer:
* Quite possibly the main pieces of the US Constitution is the tenth Amendment, which peruses, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." When an individual checks out legislative issues, it might appear to be enticing to look first to the president or to a representative. Nonetheless, on the off chance that we stay watchful, neighborhood races should be fundamental and ones for high office should be exhausting.
* We need the significant choices to stay near us, inside our urban communities and towns, and eventually with every person, family and neighborhood, since freedom truly rests not with democracy, but when we govern ourselves.
* Keeping things local builds responsibility and accountability, both of our local leaders and citizens together. In the event that somebody isn't carrying on reasonably, it's simpler to sort out what's happening if managerial capacities are taken care of locally. By remaining local, we can be more merciful with one another. At the point when your neighbor is out of luck, it's a lot simpler to assist him with trip when he lives in the neighborhood than when he lives the nation over.
Explanation:
Federalism may show up as a dark philosophical term, yet it has a truly substantial significance. It alludes to the possibility that choices about how we are represented are made at a degree of government nearest to individuals administered by that standard. It is just where totally fundamental that the neighborhood network decides to appoint power up the chain to a more elevated level of government.
