The Hamburg Massacre (or Red Shirt Massacre or Hamburg riot) was a key event in the African American town of Hamburg, South Carolina in July 1876, leading up to the last election season of the Reconstruction Era. It was the first of a series of civil disturbances planned and carried out by white Democrats in the majority-black Republican Edgefield District, with the goal of suppressing black voting, disrupting Republican meetings, and suppressing black Americans civil rights, through actual and threatened violence.[1]
Beginning with a dispute over free passage on a public road, the massacre was rooted in racial hatred and political motives. A court hearing attracted armed white "rifle clubs," colloquially called the "Red Shirts". Desiring to regain control of state governments and eradicate the civil rights of black Americans, over 100 white men attacked about 30 black servicemen of the National Guard at the armory, killing two as they tried to leave that night. Later that night, the Red Shirts tortured and murdered four of the militia while holding them as prisoners, and wounded several others. In total, the events in Hamburg resulted in the death of one white man and six black men with several more blacks being wounded. Although 94 white men were indicted for murder by a coroner's jury, none were prosecuted.
The events were a catalyst in the overarching violence in the volatile 1876 election campaign. There were other episodes of violence in the months before the election, including an estimated 100 blacks killed during several days in Ellenton, South Carolina, also in Aiken County. The Southern Democrats succeeded in "redeeming" the state government and electing Wade Hampton III as governor. During the remainder of the century, they passed laws to establish single-party white rule, impose legal segregation and "Jim Crow," and disenfranchise blacks with a new state constitution adopted in 1895. This exclusion of blacks from the political system was effectively maintained into the late 1960s.
In order to achieve their aim, this policymaker should use the Absolute Poverty Measure (Option B).
<h3>What is the Absolute Poverty Measure?</h3>
Absolute Poverty Measure refers to an economic condition or situation where the income of a household is way below the minimum levels required for them to be able to have shelter, food, clothing.
Absolute Poverty Measure is also a statistic that can be used to compare the economic welfare of people living in different geographical locations.
Learn more about Absolute Poverty Measure:
brainly.com/question/2264730
Many people could easily hack into social media accounts to gain information such as your address, phone number, and much more. It it also dangerous for children, because they are not matured enough to know that some of the people they may be talking to are strangers who may want to hurt them.
Explanation:
Inclusiveness is the act of including and incorporating ALL people of the nation that would otherwise be not included due to any problem like abilities, disabilities, medical conditions, or being a part of minorities, etc. So when people from all castes, creeds and religions are included and are given equal rights and opportunities, and are seen with the same amount of respect as see other people, then this will populate the sentiments of unity within the people and the nation. There will be no person who will be considered less on the basis of his race, ethnicity, religion, or disability, etc. In this way the sense of national unity will prevail because of the inclusiveness.
Answer:
conflict theory
Explanation:
Conflict theory was concepted by Karl Marx. He claimed that society is in the state of a perpetual conflict as there is a competition for the limited resources available in the society. It says that the social order is caused by power and domination, rather than conformity and consensus.
In the context, Dr. Moffat, who is a fictional sociologist is doing a study in parenting. He claims that parents tend to push hard their sons in the education and career more than their daughters. Because of that there is a differences in pay among men and women within the same field also.
Thus, Dr. Moffat's study falls in the conflict theory frameworks where he claims that there is always a conflict between the men and women in the society and this is greatly influenced by the parenting practice.
Hence the answer is Conflict theory
