Answer: Individualism, Equality, Informality, The Future, Change, Progress, Achievement, Action, Work, and Materialism, Directness, Assertiveness, and Time. It was easy to live together. The Indians helped the settlers by teaching them how to plant crops and survive on the land. But the Indians did not understand that the settlers were going to keep the land. This idea was foreign to the Indians.Their settlements and social groups were impermanent, and communal leadership (what little there was) was informal. After European contact, some Great Basin groups got horses and formed equestrian hunting and raiding bands that were similar to the ones we associate with the Great Plains natives.
Explanation:
Answer:
The bill was controversial beause it resulted in the geneocide of the American Indian. At the time southern and norhtern land owners alike. The bill called for voluntary removal of Amerian Indians from their lands, however this is not how it happened. Often Amerrican Indians were forced off of their ancestorial lands through pressure and fource. American Indians were eventually forced to move as far as from Northern Georgia to Oklahoma, reuslting in many Indians dying of disease, starvation and due to exposure to the elements along the way.
Explanation:
Just add this in to what you have
Answer:
It was founded to make a profit for the London Company.
The first winter over 50 settlers died of starvation and exposure.
Many men did not act wisely when they first arrived.
Explanation:
It was founded to make a profit for the London Company. (Also called Virginia Company of London)
It was built on the James River.
The colonists arrived in May of 1607.
The first winter over 50 settlers died of starvation and exposure. (about 500 died which is over 50)
Many men did not act wisely when they first arrived. (they were ill-prepared and refused to befriend the Natives)
The imperialism in Africa and Asia by the European countries had long lasting effects in big portions of these two continents, some being positive and some being negative.
The positive impacts were that the European imperialists built a lot of infrastructure in the countries they controlled. They also allowed the locals to be able to learn the Western ways of functioning, diplomacy, politics, the way their economy works. Multiple industries were developed, or at least the basics for them were set.
The negative impacts were the usage of the resources of the countries for the purpose of the European motherlands, thus taking the profit out of those countries. The borders set by the Europeans were in accordance to their interests, not the local populations, which created a very big problem further on when those countries gained independence, and lot of different ethnic groups and different religions found themselves in the same borders.
It is hard to evaluate which impact outweighing because there has been some countries that used very well the things that the Europeans left and thought them (China and Thailand for example), while others went into a direction to destroy everything the Europeans left and thought them (Zimbabwe and DR Congo for example).
