Explanation:
The first step is to figure out what the equation is. When unconventional math symbols are used, and when there are no grouping symbols identifying operands, that can be the most difficult step. Here, we think the equation is supposed to be ...
![\sqrt[3]{x+1}-2=0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx%2B1%7D-2%3D0)
It usually works well in radical equations to isolate the radical. Here that would mean adding 2 to both sides of the equation, to undo the subtraction of 2.
![\sqrt[3]{x+1}=2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx%2B1%7D%3D2)
Now, it is convenient to raise both sides of the equation to the 3rd power.

Finally, we can isolate the variable by undoing the addition of 1. We accomplish that by adding -1 to both sides of the equation.

The equation is solved. The solution is x = 7.
Yoooo ooooooooooobsudbabdjs
2.3 miles is equal to 4048 yards
This may help you
he functión Cot[x/2] is not continuos in the points
<span>x=2nπ, where n=0,1,2,3,...</span>
You can check it with a calculator. So the function is not continuos in
the domain the problem gives you, so the Rolle's theorem can not be
applied. If the inteverval was,
<span>[π/2,3π/2]</span>
Then we could apply the Rolle's theorem.
The value of x if that's what you mean is 2 because first you add 3 from both sides and your new equation should be 2x>14-5×, then you add 5x from both sides and your new equation should be 7x>14. After that you divide 14 by 7 and your final answer will be x=2 or 2