<span>erik erikson(1902-1994), a german psychoanalyst developed an
eight stage theory to identify and psychosocial development. he was greatly
influenced by sigmund freud and his works. by the great works his mentor, he
explored three aspects of identity: the ego identity(self), personal identity
and social/cultural identity. according to his theory of development, every
person must pass through a series of 8 interrelated stages over the entire life
cycle. 1.infancy:birth-18 months old(basic trust vs mistrust). 2.toddler/early
childhood years:18 months to 3 years(autonomy vs shame). 3.preschooler:3-5
years old(initiative vs guilt). 4.school age child:6-12 years(industry vs
inferiority). 5.adolescent:12-18 years(identity vs role confusion). 6.young
adult:18-35 years(intimacy and solidarity vs isolation). 7.middle-aged
adult:35-55 or 65(generativity vs self absorption or stagnation). 8.late
adult:55 or 65-death(integrity vs despair). 2. toddler/early childhood years:
18 months to 3 years(autonomy vs shame):- this stage according to erikson,
occurs between the ages of 18 months to 3 years. at this stage, the child has
the opportunity to build self-esteem and autonomy as he/she learns new skills
for him/her self with pride rather than shame. also during time, defiance, temper,
tantrums and stubbornness may appear. children tend to be vulnerable during
this stage, sometimes feeling shame and low self-esteem during an inability to
learn certain new skills.</span>
The answer that best fits the blank is serfs.
The answer is A. The standing committees. Hope this helps.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
Causation fallacy (Oversimplification or exaggeration fallacy)
This fallacy is also known as fallacy of reduction or multiplication
Explanation:
The oversimplification or exaggeration fallacy is used to appeal the fact that one single act would unchain several consequences of the same type without any cause to link it as a real proof of the possible occurrence. In this case, it is simple a prediction that is not based on any type of fact or scientific evidence to prove that this will certainly happen.
This is an example of "self-fulfilling prophecy".
A self-fulfilling prophecy is a conviction that works out on the grounds that we are going about as though it is as of now obvious. Our desire that we will see a specific result changes our conduct, which shapes the way others see us. Thus, others give the criticism we've set ourselves up to get, which serves to fortify the first conviction.
