Hi! Technically it is a complete sentance but it's not really gramatically correct or not very explanatory. It doesen't include any other information, but yes, it is a complete sentance.
Hope this helps! Have a good day!
There are few conflicts evident here.
- man v man
- man v self
- man v school board (society)
I'll choose man v self and man v man.
Marcus faces a man v man conflict. Mr. Benson has apprehended him for essentially <span>attacking his substitute teacher, "like some kind of fundamentalist." Marcus, becoming more and more inflamed steps up to Mr. Benson and says a few choice words. Thus doing so, Mr. Benson fundamentally threatens Marcus with expulsion. Marcus, now battling within himself (man v self) contemplates on whether he should back down, or defend his cause. He meditates over the consequences and eventually decided to ignore all the odds; freedom meant more to him than reputation. </span>
It is Piers Plownman it is not an epic
Answer:
-supporting evidence.
-contributory facts.
-specialised data [raw data appear in the appendix, summarised data appear in the body of the text.]
-technical figures, tables or descriptions.
-detailed description of research instruments.
-maps.
Explanation:
