Answer:
Ancient china and Egyptian civilization shared and differed in a number of factors.
Explanation:
Both of this civilizations had access to rives which are; The river Nile for Egypt and the Yellow river for China. This rivers acted as sources of water that played a great role in both civilizations. Rivers acted as a source of fish, they also flooded making the nearby land fertile for farming in early civilizations.
Both civilizations had a special way of writing that helped them communicate important ideas. The Egyptian had the famous hieroglyphic being the most famous among their ancient scripts.
The two civilizations had formalized governments, however, this governments differed in terms of ideology. The china government was a monarchy while the Egyptian monarchy was a theocracy.
They both were developed in architecture but differed in the structures they build. The Chinese civilization built the great wall of china while the Egyptians built the pyramids. This structures exist to date.
Answer:
The state economy grew
Explanation:
Manufacturing activity increased dramatically in Georgia so the economy grew.
If you need 2 answers you could also pick that algacultural production soared!
The main purpose of public opinion polls is to gain data/information on how citizens feel about a particular topic, event, or political candidate. For example, one of the most popular political polls we see usually asks citizens to assess the president's recent actions. This type of question allows for a general understanding of what people like/dislike about the president.
Public opinion polls, however, can be used for almost any topic. From their, people will analyze the information in order to understand what things can be improved on or what exactly the citizens want.
It's clear that one of the systems does not work. Corruption and failure are not strangers to either system, but one of them has a higher success rate to prove its point.
The first argument is pretty simple. Socialism has never worked. From that view, it is pretty clear that empirical evidence suggests that socialism usually ends up turning into an oppressive pseudo capitalist corporatism, as it has happened in South America repeatedly, or it will become a dictatorship, as it has happened in South America, Africa and even to Russia and its neighbor countries.
Socialism, to work, has to have state force using firearms to impose their will upon the others. It smashes the will and freedom of minorities, and by minorities I mean anyone who disagrees with them, and forces them, with the raw and physical power of the State, to behave accordingly.
Capitalism, though, is all about competition and voluntarism when it is not infected with the corrupted politicians that ally themselves with big companies, making an ugly son that we call corporatism. But even when that is the case, people tend to have something to eat, that can't be said about current Venezuela and North Korea.
