Answer: The problem is that author lists form an important part of any academic CV where they are present in the “Publications” section. For example, a snippet from my CV: If someone is listed as an author just for giving 'helpful comments.
Explanation:
Please make brainliest
Answer: D Gender biased.
Explanation: As a supervisor she is qualified to be paid the same amount her counterparts or co- supervisors are receiving. As the do the same work and we on the same grade. She is the only lady among the supervisors and the only one paid less. Naturally it will be assumed that her work place is gender biased if not others should be paid less.
As supervisors the all do the same amount of work and share the same amount of responsibilities. So if she is right that she is being discriminated it means her workplace is gender biased.
Answer:
c created less direct tax on goods
Explanation:
the townshend acts were more broad and less direct, where the stamp act put a direct tax on postage
Answer:
The higher the temperature, the faster the reaction
Explanation:
Particles only react together when they collide with one another. An increase in temperature of reaction will lead to faster collision between the particles involved in the reaction and this happens because increased temperature puts the particles in a more excited state i.e they have higher kinetic energy. Higher kinetic energy then results in more frequent collisions which in turn makes the reaction happen faster
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
