"I would give him a score of about 5 out of 10, which was a vast improvement over John Q. Adams and his cronies. If you were a poor, white male, he was your guy. He greatly democratized the process of elections in that era and was our first grassroots president. However, Jackson usually did what Jackson wanted to do, even if it meant alienating many of the people who got him elected. He did not side with Southerners during the nullification crisis and was prepared to use troops against South Carolina to enforce a law that most Southerners hated. He blatantly ignored John Marshall’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia, but an argument could be made here that he was acting in favor of democracy in this case, as most white Southerners probably wanted the Cherokee moved off of their land. He was a very complex and fascinating guy, but his critics called him King Andrew for a reason." -Robert Marshall
Answer:
indirect channel
Explanation:
Direct channel : When company sell their product/services without using intermediary (other individuals or companies)
Indirect channel: When company sell their product/services by using intermediary
From the information, we know that Mamie already established a social and online presence. To boost their sales, they can use online intermediary (such as Instagram and you tube influences) to promote their product, and give the influences a certain percentage of the profit.
This method will require very little risk and capital requirement for Umami compared to making huge investment in strengthening their direct channel.
Answer:
Community development is a holistic approach grounded in principles of empowerment, human rights, inclusion, social justice, self-determination and collective action (Kenny, 2007). Community development considers community members to be experts in their lives and communities, and values community knowledge and wisdom.
Explanation:
Answer:
Answer is Option B: that she was under undo duress from her son and daughter-in-law and that the agreement is voidable.
Explanation:
When the broker came to offer Mrs. G, the price he offered was quite less than what she was asking for. Still his son and his wife urged her to sign the offer. So, later she can claim that she was under a lot of threat and violence from her son and daughter-in-law to sign the offer and it would make the agreement voidable.
She cannot claim about Broker's offering less price, as per Option A. Neither she can say that Broker defrauded them, as per Option C. Option D is also incorrect as it says that her consumer rights were taken illegally by her son and his wife.
