Question

Briefly explain why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted.

Answer 1

It is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted in order to address and refine the problems of a specific argument. To critique an argument also eliminates biases in order to make the argument valid. It should also pass a certain standard to make it qualified for acceptance.

Answer 2

To be accepted, a scientific argument must first proved it's solidity and validity and critiques from other expert is usually the best way to explain both the solidity and the validity of a scientific argument

hope this helps