Briefly explain why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted.

2 answers:

4 0

It is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted in order to address and refine the problems of a specific argument. To critique an argument also eliminates biases in order to make the argument valid. It should also pass a certain standard to make it qualified for acceptance.

Alenkasestr [34]3 years ago

3 0

To be accepted, a scientific argument must first proved it's solidity and validity and critiques from other expert is usually the best way to explain both the solidity and the validity of a scientific argument

hope this helps

You might be interested in

Attached earlobes are a recessive trait in humans. In the tree below, people with attached earlobes are shaded in. Which best de

Wewaii [24]

The square denotes male. One parent is recessive, so X must have at least one recessive allele. B is the right answer.

3 0

3 years ago

In a bacterium, cell division takes place when

IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

C. The DNA copied, a new cell membrane forms between the DNA copies, and the cell splits into two cells.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What is the molar mass of the chemical (NH4)2SO4?

enyata [817]

Answer:

hi find the attachment

Explanation:

i hope this help

6 0

3 years ago

Organs work together as components of

stira [4]

Answer: Organs are grouped into organ systems, in which they work together to carry out a particular function for the organism. For example, the heart and the blood vessels make up the cardiovascular system.

8 0

2 years ago

If all living things are made up of cells which of the following statements must be true

Nana76 [90]

Answer:

i dont really know what you mean by this, but this is the best answer i can give:

Cells are the smallest unit can be considered alive

Explanation:

i hope this helps you! <3

7 0

3 years ago