1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
3 years ago
12

Why does Churchill most likely raise questions about the sense and necessity of continuing the war?

History
2 answers:
Lera25 [3.4K]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer is B. He wants to address the same question that his audience is thinking about.

Churchill was a writer, army officer and British politician. He was a United Kingdom prime minister. He led to victory of wold war 11 in Britain during his time as a prime minister.

As a member of conservative party he ended his career in parliament where he was a prominent member.

In United Kingdom he played an important role as a liberal democracy defender which resulted from fascism spread.

He was a wartime leader who was victorious.

ohaa [14]3 years ago
3 0

"He wants to address the same questions that his audience is thinking about." (APEX)

You might be interested in
How did the Cold War affect the political situation of developing countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America? Was it a positiv
Illusion [34]

Answer: On January 9, 1964, a riot erupted in the Panama Canal Zone, a U.S.-controlled territory in the

heart of Panama. The trouble began when Panamanian students tried to raise Panama's

national flag at an American high school. American residents objected and fighting broke out.

The riots continued over the next three days as thousands of Panamanians joined in. More than

20 people died in the unrest.

The riots in the Canal Zone reflected longstanding resentment of the U.S. presence in Panama.

The United States had controlled the Canal Zone since 1903. A treaty signed that year gave the

United States rights to the Panama Canal and the land around it “in perpetuity” (forever). Since

then, the United States had viewed the canal as essential to international trade and American

security.

President Lyndon Johnson blamed the riots on communist Cuba. He claimed that Cuba was

“sending guns, money, and agents into Panama” to encourage revolution. For the people of

Panama and the rest of Latin America, however, the riots were an expression of nationalism.

They saw the Canal Zone as a symbol of American imperialism.

The riots did have one positive effect, though. The United States began negotiations to hand the

canal over to Panama. It took many years, but in 1977 the United States and Panama finally

signed the Panama Canal Treaties. On December 31, 1999, Panama gained full control over the

canal.

The story of the Panama Canal riots is one example of the legacy of imperialism, which took on

new life during the Cold War. In this lesson, you will learn more about that legacy and how it

affected nations and people around the world.

3 0
3 years ago
Bernard de Gálvez led troops to victory in Florida at in 1781.
uysha [10]
Is this a true or false question

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what way did sostre and his bookstore eventually become the target of authorities?\
Dimas [21]
Sostre was believed to have been producing molotovs in his basement and organizing looting and arson and similar things so they arrested him. He was eventually moved to a different prison which enabled him to contact his lawyers more and the case developed and people started polarizing over the idea of whether he was a good guy or a bad guy.
4 0
3 years ago
The Ottoman Empire joined forces with the powers during World War I.
bixtya [17]

Answer:

Central Powers

Explanation:

The answer is the Central Powers. The Ottoman Empire consisted of the Kingdom of Bulgaria, Ottoman Empire, Germany, and Austro-Hungarian Empire. Hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
How did the limited central government created by the Articles of Confederation reflect the concern with individual liberties fo
dsp73

Answer:

The only powers granted by the Articles of Confederation were things like declaring war, foreign affairs, or making treaties- powers necessary for the government during the Revolution. The states were only unified by a "firm league of friendship," and each state had one vote in Congress no matter the size, to ensure that the larger states did not infringe on the rights or wishes of the smaller states.

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS YOU!!!  

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • East Pakistan became __________________ in 1971.
    15·2 answers
  • What is the risk of having a dynamic rather than a constitutive defense response?
    6·1 answer
  • What are the three reasons that prevented Native Americans from Voting.
    5·1 answer
  • 3. What would happen if a tribe stayed in one place?
    6·1 answer
  • What did lincoln steffens report in "the shame of the cities"
    6·2 answers
  • Why were the most major cities in the new england colonies established in harbors?
    11·1 answer
  • The very last of the 13 original colonies founded by Great Britain, Georgia's charter as a colony was given to General James Ogl
    8·1 answer
  • Which theocratic ideal came from the romans
    11·1 answer
  • How did abraham lincoln get the states to change the constitution
    6·1 answer
  • Who was a US Diplomat?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!