Answer:
True, but it rarely works well.
Explanation:
The most recent and largest failure by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has just happened in Argentina, where the government received over $50 billion in loans that it is unable to pay. The IMF has never been successful in any country where it has helped to develop a new economic plan. Ironically, some Nobel prize winners (including Joseph Stiglitz) tell countries to do exactly the opposite to what the IMF tells them to do, and that has worked much better.
On the other hand, the World Bank has had some limited success in South American countries like Bolivia and Uruguay, specially with helping to develop new industries or expand existing ones. In Bolivia it helped to develop a new agricultural plan that improved the economy of the Santa Cruz region a lot, and it is one of its major economic successes. In Uruguay it financed new projects related to paper businesses that increased the nations GDP by almost 10%.
This is the reason why the IMF has such a bad rep while the World Bank is still seen as a valid option for financing large investment projects.
They are most beneficial when they join together resources and knowledge in a combination that complies with the VRIO framework.
Material requirements plus an allowance for normal inefficiencies are added together to determine the Quantity Standard of a direct material per unit of output.
<h3>What is
direct material ?</h3>
The cost of direct materials, which may be easily recognised with the unit of production. In the manufacture of light bulbs, for example, the cost of glass is a direct material cost. Material was required as the primary component in the creation of items or goods.
Direct material refers to the physical components of a product. A baker's direct materials, for example, include flour, eggs, yeast, sugar, oil, and water. The direct materials concept is utilised in cost accounting, where this expense is categorised independently in various types of financial analysis.
Direct materials are those that are essential to the manufacturing process and can be traced back to the specific product manufactured.
To know more about direct material follow the link:
brainly.com/question/26245657
#SPJ4
Answer:
Britain
Explanation:
Once they landed in America, the British set up a joint stock company, which was the start of what we now recognize as a corporation These stocks were marketed to investors with the thought of getting some cash, which created minimal-risk capital.Citizens embraced the idea as there was minimal risk and significant benefit. It really is accurate, therefore, that joint stock companies were organisations planned by the British to create colonies in America.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
False. The location-specific advantages argument associated with John Dunning does help explain the direction of FDI. However, the location-specific advantages argument does not explain why firms prefer FDI to licensing or to exporting.
quizlet
