Answer:
One of the angles in the triangle might be 50.
AND
The length of the third side must be 11cm or smaller.
Step-by-step explanation:
-The triangle might be an equilateral triangle (having all the same sides and angles). False, since the triangle sum theorem states that all angles inside of a triangle must add up to 180, so an equilateral triangle would need to have all three angles at 60 degrees.
-One of the angles in the triangle must be 120 (false; it can be anything above 90, which is not only 120)
-The length of the third side must be 11cm or smaller. (True, Triangle Inequality Theorem)
-One of the angles in the triangle might be 50 (possibly, so very much true)
Answer:
(c, m) = (45, 10)
Step-by-step explanation:
A dozen White Chocolate Blizzards generate more income and take less flour than a dozen Mint Breezes, so production of those should clearly be maximized. Making 45 dozen Blizzards does not use all the flour, so the remaining flour can be used to make Breezes.
Maximum Blizzards that can be made: 45 dz. Flour used: 45×5 oz = 225 oz.
The remaining flour is ...
315 oz -225 oz = 90 oz
This is enough for (90 oz)/(9 oz/dz) = 10 dozen Mint Breezes. This is in the required range of 2 to 15 dozen.
Kelly should make 45 dozen White Chocolate Blizzards and 10 dozen Mint Breezes: (c, m) = (45, 10).
__
In the attached graph, we have reversed the applicable inequalities so the feasible region shows up white, instead of shaded with 5 different colors. The objective function is the green line, shown at the point that maximizes income. (c, m) ⇔ (x, y)
Answer:



Step-by-step explanation:
we have
step 1
Group terms that contain the same variable, and move the constant to the opposite side of the equation

step 2
Factor 5 left side

step 3
Complete the square



step 4
Rewrite as perfect squares

step 5



step 6

Answer:
1/2 a bag
Step-by-step explanation:
1/2 a piece is smaller than 1/2 a bag because the bag is bigger
598,909 is the answer because when I put that for a test I got it right