1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anni [7]
4 years ago
11

This document was written in 1987. Which advantages does the writer have when writing so many years after the events took place?

Select all that apply.
1.The writer is able to view the events with a more detached eye.
2.The writer is able to ignore events that do not fit with his thesis.
3.The writer is able to place events into better context with those going around the world.
4.The writer is able to mimic the prevailing thoughts of historians.
5.The writer is able to see the effects of decisions, making it easier to determine what is important.
History
1 answer:
Elanso [62]4 years ago
3 0

The writer is able to view the events with a more detached eye
<span>The writer is able to place events into better context with those going around the world
</span><span>The writer is able to see the effects of decisions, making it easier to determine what is important</span>
You might be interested in
Use examples from both sources to explain similarities and differences in the author's claims about the: interactions between Na
VLD [36.1K]

Interactions between natives and European explorers had an impact on native populations by instituting new social and economic dynamics.

<h3 /><h3>What are the impacts of colonization on the native population?</h3>

Indigenous culture was directly impacted by the arrival of European explorers to the Americas, who instituted a new religion, customs, in addition to having used the natives to practice slave labor and having contaminated this population with new diseases, such as influenza and smallpox.

Therefore, historically it is possible to see that European colonization in the new world had negative impacts on native populations, which were significantly reduced by violence and diseases brought by explorers.

Find out more about European colonization here:

brainly.com/question/19482514

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Major problems facing the soviet system, in the view of gorbachev, included low agricultural productivity, which he saw vividly
Andrej [43]
<span>The unexpected reappearance of collective patriotism among the ninety-two ethnic groups in the Soviet Union.

There was no consumer boom in the USSR when Mikhail Gorbachev was in the leadership position.  And the military and political elite certainly were not advocating changes.  It was Gorbachev who advocated policies such as <em /><em>perestroika </em>(restructuring) to try to aid the economy, and <em>glasnost </em>(openness) to respond to the desires of the people to be able to express themselves with a greater degree of freedom.
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Contextualization) According to the author of this article, what kind of person is Nat Turner? Think about when this article was
sashaice [31]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not include the article so we can read it. You neither attach the link of the article, the name of it, or the author. Without that information, we do not know what you are talking about.

However, trying to help you, we can comment on the following.

Some authors considered Nat Turner as a dangerous man. Some others, as a criminal. Most of them, as a trouble maker.

Ono of those particular articles was published before Turner had been sentenced. So this article tried to influence public opinion, portraying Turner as a criminal, causing so much fury in the community. As was expected, white people demanded harsh punishment for him.

But now we know that the article had a particular agenda. Nat Turner was not an assassin. He was just fighting for his convictions. Turner had led the rebellion of Virginia slaves in August 1831.

5 0
3 years ago
Before railroads, people lived mainly near waterways.
Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

You can technically build a "cities" without waterways, however, it further complicates transportation, trade, and relations with other cities. For a city to thrive, it must have some way of being able to transport goods, resources, and people from the place to anywhere else, and back. Waterways, paved roads, pathways, and later planes and helicopters are all ways of transportation. However, the most natural and easiest one was by waterways. Waterways utilized boats, which can generally hold more than any land transportation at the time, and uses the current for travelling, which typically can help speed, or even impede the transportation process.

~

3 0
3 years ago
The prime meridian is a another name for
irakobra [83]
Green which or international meridian is the answer
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which group in France would have been most likely to support the Reign of Terror?
    12·1 answer
  • How did pro-slavery groups influence the Kansas elections in 1855?
    12·1 answer
  • The population in england's american colonies grew more quickly than the population in england itself for a number of reasons. W
    8·1 answer
  • Which facts represent the economic reality the nation faced in 1933?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following factors was a major cause of the Great Depression?<br><br> APEX
    8·1 answer
  • What did the Supreme Court say in its ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)?
    8·2 answers
  • Please answer soon.
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the 1942 Allied strategy in North Africa? The Allies advanced on Axis troops in Libya from
    8·1 answer
  • What country borders China to the north?
    5·2 answers
  • Use context clues to define the word in italics below
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!