1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anni [7]
3 years ago
11

This document was written in 1987. Which advantages does the writer have when writing so many years after the events took place?

Select all that apply.
1.The writer is able to view the events with a more detached eye.
2.The writer is able to ignore events that do not fit with his thesis.
3.The writer is able to place events into better context with those going around the world.
4.The writer is able to mimic the prevailing thoughts of historians.
5.The writer is able to see the effects of decisions, making it easier to determine what is important.
History
1 answer:
Elanso [62]3 years ago
3 0

The writer is able to view the events with a more detached eye
<span>The writer is able to place events into better context with those going around the world
</span><span>The writer is able to see the effects of decisions, making it easier to determine what is important</span>
You might be interested in
Why did the Anasazi leave Chaco Canyon? How did archaeologists make these determinations? Help! I need the answer fast! I'll giv
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

lots of things made them leave

Explanation:

Drought was a big reason but also because the people  weren't clean which probably caused health problems. There was also alot of pests and while animals among the area. There was also volcanos and violence happening. Archaologists were really unsure they thought they left abruptly, but now they say they were forced out because of the things that were there to endure.

3 0
3 years ago
Which points support your answer?
lisov135 [29]

Answer:

C. The hostages were held in Iran for more than a year and could have come home sooner.

D. Carter should have focused more on US policies rather than dealing with international disagreements.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Do people live in greece or no?????????
pentagon [3]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
In deteresa v. abc, a federal appellate court held that
Goshia [24]
<span>ABC did NOT violate Deteresa's rights.

Hope this helps !

Photon</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Rousseau would have supported the idea that
enot [183]

Answer:

The correct answer to this question is B) a supreme being is, by nature, good.

Explanation:

 Rousseau would support the idea that a supreme being is, by nature, good.  

Jean-Jaques Rousseau (1712-1778) was a Swiss philosopher that inspired the ideas of the French Revolution. His ideas have transcended generations to modern-day times, for the importance of liberty as a universal aspiration for humans. In that sense, Rousseau supported the idea that a supreme being is, by nature, good.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these countries did the United States gain because of the Spanish American War?
    15·2 answers
  • What were the barriers to trade in Ancient Rome ( what made it hard to trade )
    11·1 answer
  • HELP WILL NAME BRAINLIEST PLZZZZ HELP MEEEE
    6·1 answer
  • What group of people who make laws for the country
    9·2 answers
  • What is the difference between the Senate and the House of representatives?
    11·1 answer
  • true or false: the most famous characteristic of an Old Testament prophet was that he could occasionally predict the future.
    12·1 answer
  • Can anybody help.This is from America this is us
    12·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast the experience and implications of marriage?
    15·1 answer
  • 1. How did mercantilism affect trade?
    7·2 answers
  • Was Food Scarce in Athens, Sparta or both in ancient Greece?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!