1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio039 [100]
3 years ago
10

Indicate whether the statements below are true or false. Group of answer choices When you create an original work and put a Crea

tive Commons attribution license on it, you are still the copyright holder. In order to be a copyright holder you must register with the U.S. Copyright Office.
Social Studies
1 answer:
harina [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

When you create an original work and put a Creative Commons attribution license on it, you are still the copyright holder - <em>TRUE</em>.

In order to be a copyright holder you must register with the U.S. Copyright Office - <em>FALSE</em>.

Explanation:

<u>TRUE </u>

<u>When you create an original work, you are automatically protected by the copyright law.</u> Creative Commons is a license that you attribute to your work and thus, you still hold all the copyright rights. There are many types of Creative Commons licenses, for example, where you can give users rights to do anything they want with your ‘work’, but you will still be the copyright holder.

<u>FALSE </u>

<u>You are the copyright owner of your created original work, from the moment you create it. Registering it with the U.S Copyright Office is not needed to have copyright protection.</u> However if you want to file an infringement lawsuit to protect your work, that you created within U.S borders, then you need to register it with the U.S Copyright Office.

You might be interested in
How did victory at Trenton affect Americans.
miv72 [106K]
D. Americans had renewed hope.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened to Atlanta as a result of the bourbon triumvirate?
Oliga [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

Demise of the Triumvirate

The term Bourbon Triumvirate refers to Georgia's three most powerful and prominent politicians of the post-Reconstruction era: Joseph E. Brown, Alfred H. Colquitt, and John B. Gordon. This trio practically held a lock on the state's U.S. Senate seats and governor's office from 1872 to 1890: Brown as senator from 1880 until 1890; Colquitt as governor from 1876 through 1882, and as senator from 1883 until 1894; and Gordon as senator from 1872 until 1880, governor from 1886 until 1890, and senator again from 1891 until 1897. The political careers of all three men benefited from their service during the Civil War (1861-65); Brown had served as the governor of Confederate Georgia, and Colquitt and Gordon had both risen to the rank of major general in the Confederate army by the war's end.

Colquitt, one of the state's leading planters, cast himself as a representative of the interests of the old planter class, while Brown, an industrialist who became one of Georgia's first millionaires, represented the New South businessmen. Gordon had a mixed record as a businessman and a worse record as a planter, but Gordon excelled at espousing the New South rhetoric of commercial and industrial development by shrewdly exploiting the Lost Cause of the Confederacy.

All three men had extensive interests in the railroad and coal-mining industries, among other commercial pursuits. All three championed white supremacy; a frugal state government that demanded little of taxpayers, and accordingly provided few services; and the maintenance of subservient labor forces on farms and in factories. Gordon and especially Brown both made use of convict labor in their industrial enterprises.

The "Atlanta Ring"

While Brown, Colquitt, and Gordon shared many economic and political interests and beliefs, they also differed on many points, and historians have since questioned the validity of the epithet "Bourbon Triumvirate."  

The noted southern historian C. Vann Woodward argued that the term Bourbon, which implies a steadfast refusal to accept or learn from the defeat of the Civil War and adapt to new realities, hardly fit these three postbellum Georgia leaders, and other historians have convincingly shown that the trio did not possess the unity of interests and purpose that the term triumvirate implies.

More aptly, the trio could be viewed as the core of the larger "Atlanta Ring," which also included Atlanta Constitution editors Evan Howell and Henry W. Grady. These two preeminent journalists, particularly Grady, played important roles in the trio's political strategizing, most notably in the suspicious series of events involving Gordon's sudden resignation from the U.S. Senate and his replacement by Brown in 1880, as well as Gordon's somewhat delayed but ultimately successful entry into the 1886 governor's race. In this contest, Grady masterfully exploited Gordon's Civil War legacy to help him derail the seemingly unstoppable campaign of Augustus O. Bacon of Macon, a leading opponent of the Atlanta Ring who later became a U.S. senator himself.

Demise of the Triumvirate After Gordon became governor, the always limited solidarity among the members of the Bourbon Triumvirate began to collapse.

8 0
3 years ago
a. Read the first section about the diseases, high mortality rates, and predominantly male society that evolved in the Chesapeak
bulgar [2K]

Answer: As a male, I would not have been motivated to leave England for this environment because I would have thought of the possibility of fatal outcomes that would cause loss of life to me and my family over any opportunities of financial gains available in the colonies.

Explanation: The availability of any opportunities in the Chesapeake colonies would not have motivated me anymore once I had got to know about the fatal conditions there. The reason I would have chosen to stay back in England and take care of myself and my family would be the vulnerability to death prevalent in the Chesapeake colonies.

4 0
3 years ago
Which reasons below explain why the antifederalists objected to the constitution
Anton [14]

Answer:

power will be too centralised

because they feared that new national government will be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties given the absence of a bill of right

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How might a country with<br> only one valuable resource develop its econom
vodomira [7]

Answer:

It will eventually build on to their economy and be more valuable to the economy.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to hans eysenck, personality can be best described in terms of which basic trait dimensions?
    14·1 answer
  • In this section the mahabharata, krishna talks about doing ones duty
    8·1 answer
  • A binocular depth cue is a cue that helps detect distance based on the use of either eye.<br> t/f
    5·1 answer
  • What is real courage?
    5·1 answer
  • What are 4 specific things you can do to improve your memory for course material based on the 2 lectures we recently had on ltm
    10·1 answer
  • Europe does not have a lot of access to water<br><br> TRUE OR FALSE
    5·2 answers
  • What did NOT occur as a result of the outcome the French and Indian War? A. Restrictions on western settlement increased colonia
    6·1 answer
  • How can culture bias the way researchers interpret their findings?<br> Give one example of this
    7·1 answer
  • List 3 reasons why we should always document our sources of supporting material​
    10·1 answer
  • A personality assessment in which a person responds to ambiguous stimuli, revealing unconscious feelings, impulses, and desires
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!