Carl rogers would explain that <span>It results from a psychological conflict between Jeff's personal desire to stay up late and the opinion adopted from his parents that it is wrong to stay up late.
Since Jeff is experiencing the pressure to fulfill his parents' wishes, he felt that he's betraying them in some ways by staying up late, which resulted in the emotion of guilt.</span>
The correct answer is no.
Alisha was under no obligation to help Timmy, <em>there is no such thing like</em> <em>duty to rescue.</em> There is no legal requirement in the United States to help and rescue someone who is in danger. Even in extreme situation, when a person sees a person falling into a river for example, the witness of the situation is no obliged to assist with help.
There are some cases with some important exceptions: if the defendant created the peril he is obliged to come to the plaintiff's aid, if the defendant started to rescue the plaintiff, he must continue to do so, if the defendant is in a special relationship with the plaintiff ( teacher-student, worker-employer), he is under duty to rescue him.
Alisha was under no duty to inform Timmy's parents of the danger facing him <em>but she should have done it nevertheless.</em> She should at least have phoned them if she didn't have the time to stop by. She knew the boy well and she should have cared more. The need to help the boy should have come from her moral guidance and not as a sense of duty to be performed.
Answer: FALSE
Explanation: Employment discrimination also affects the treatment of employees in terms of promotions and demotions, work schedules and assignments. In the case of an employee who is suffering from discrimination, that person would most likely not get due privileges which he or she ought to get.
Answer:
This demonstrates correlation, not causation
Explanation:
correlation is interdependence between two variable thereby meaning to say how one behave with change in other. If there is change in A be will also change or if there is change in B then A will change.
while causation is applied where Any action lead to consequences.
It means if A happens then B will happens but it is not necessarily true that if B happens A is the only reason behind it.
Here Mr Kent. has made a conclusion that sedentary lifestyle causes Obesity hence hence applied Causation to make conclusion for all adults and hence it wrong.
While it is given that sedentary lifestyle and increased obesity is correlated.
hence option C is correct answer.