Answer:
$21000
Explanation:
To determine Gray’s tax basis for a 50% interest in the Fabco Partnership, The interest is increased by the partner’s distributive share of all partnership items of income and decreased by the partner’s distributive share of all loss and deduction items.
Gray’s beginning basis = $5,000
Gray’s 50% distributive share of ordinary income = 50% × $20000 = $10000
Gray’s 50% tax-exempt income= 50% × $8000 = $4,000 and
portfolio income = 50% × $4000 = $2,000
Therefore, the ending basis of Gray’s Fabco partnership interest = $5000 + $10000 + $4000 + $2000 = $21000
Answer:
The answer to this question is c. Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario displayed above Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
A Quasi contract is a contract that is created by a court order, not by an agreement made by the parties to the contract. For example, quasi contracts are created by the court when no official agreement exists between the parties, in disputes over payments for goods or services
In this case there has not been an official agreement between Kathy and the hospital, However she has to pay the bill presented to her based on Quasi contract which is created to prevent an individual to be unjustly enriched or from benefiting from the situation when he/she does not deserve to do so.
Hence the answer is c. Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
Answer:
<h2>In this case,visit to the Butchart Garden is an excludable and non-rivalrous good and is an example of a Club Good.</h2>
Explanation:
First,since the Burchart Gardens charges an admission fee of $30 for each visitor,anyone who has not paid the fee cannot or will not be able to have access inside the garden.Therefore,it is currently not a free service for all the visitors.In this sense,a visit to the Butchart Garden is excludable.It can be assumed that any visitor who wishes to come inside the garden and have a visit will have to mandatorily pay the admission fee.
Secondly,as Butchart Garden is a public area and anyone who pays the admission fee can officially gain access to the garden,enjoyment of the natural and aesthetic beauty of the garden by any one visitor does not reduce the simultaneous enjoyment of any other visitor who has paid the admission fee and hence,gained access to the garden.In economic language,if we consider the garden visit as a particular commodity,then the consumption of the commodity by any one visitor or consumer does not reduce the simultaneous consumption of any other visitor/s or consumer/s,provided that they have all paid the admission fee to gain access to the commodity or garden in this case.Therefore,visits to the Butchart Garden can be considered as non-rivalrous.
Now,since the visit to the Butchart garden is both excludable and non-rivalrous in nature,it can be considered as an example of a Club Good.
Answer: B. Capital leases do not transfer ownership of the asset under the lease, but operating leases often do.
Explanation:
When using Capital Leases, the lessee will record the lease as if it were their own asset and as a result will also depreciate it. The lessee will also create a long term liability on their balance sheet for the asset.
Capital leases usually also involve a transfer of ownership to the lessee at the end of the lease term. Operating Leases on the other hand do not have these features. They are more like a rental of an asset and as such are recorded as a rental expense in the books of the lessee. The ownership remains with the lessor in an Operating Lease and the asset will be returned once the lease period is over.
Answer:
a. factory overhead cost
b. factory overhead cost
c. factory overhead cost
d. direct labor cost
e. direct materials cost
f. direct labor cost
g. factory overhead cost
h. direct materials cost
i. direct materials cost
j. factory overhead cost
Explanation:
Direct Material Costs and Direct Labor Costs are easily traceable to the cost object whilst its difficult to trace Factory Overhead Costs to the cost object.
