Mercantilism is the correct answer <span />
Answer: Because the janitor is aware of your plight, the first thing to consider is this being a trick to extort you or to waste your time. After considering it to be a trick, you still have to consider it to be true. This makes it a game of 50:50 chance ( that is equal chance to loss or win).
To approach this situation, you have to define an agreement with the janitor. The agreement should be "send me the chemistry master and I will pay you after I have written the exam to confirm it is actually a chemistry master or pay you 1/10 of your amount if it is not, to compensate your efforts". After sending this agreement, you should focused on your studies like you're not expecting a positive response from him.
Negotiation should not be involved in the agreement, as it will waste your time of studies.
The matching of the phrase to their meaning base on judicial system are;
- Judicial restraint: relies heavily on involves strict interpretation.
- judicial activism: courts play active role
- in shaping social policy.
<h3>What is judiciary system?</h3>
judiciary system serves as as as a system that deals with administration of justice in the Court of law.
Judicial activism is a philosophy which says judges can deviate from strict adherence of law while judicial restraint is the opposite.
When a court limits powers to strike down laws (judicial activism) means that there could be a little deviation from handling similar cases that has been handled before.
Learn more about judiciary system at;
brainly.com/question/4937540
#SPJ1
According to Merton's typology of prejudice and discrimination, Xavier is an unprejudiced nondiscriminator, whereas Reuben is a prejudiced nondiscriminator.
<h3>Unprejudiced vs. Prejudiced</h3>
Xavier and Reuben cannot be accused of discrimination of African Americans since they both accept them in their chess club. However, there is a big difference between Xavier and Reuben, even if their behavior is the same.
Xavier truly believes African Americans are as intelligent as white Americans, which means he is unprejudiced. Reuben, on the other hand, does not hold the same belief. He is prejudiced against African Americans, thinking they have weak cognitive abilities.
Therefore, even though both can be considered nondiscriminators, Xavier is unprejudiced, whereas Reuben is prejudiced.
Learn more about nondiscriminators here:
brainly.com/question/13782165
#SPJ12
