Answer:
More importantly, Hildegard used her visionary experiences to enhance and promote her status as a religious leader, and to combat the medieval view of women as simply flawed men, while maintaining a position of respect and admiration throughout her life.
Explanation:
The correct answer is True
It is the scientific area that studies the bones. It results from the application of knowledge of Anthropology to questions of law with regard to the identification of cadaverous remains (necroidentification).
Through bones, we can obtain data on the sex, age, stature of the deceased and details of the person's life (eating habits, some diseases, injuries, etc.)
Excavation findings can have several origins: corpses abandoned in an advanced stage of decomposition, disfigured bodies resulting from mutilations, or corpses that may correspond to individuals who are victims of mass disasters (aviation accidents, shipwrecks, natural disasters, etc.).
However, this study is only complete if it is possible to collect data that, in comparative terms, can individualize the person, because only with the data related to sex, age, body proportions it is practically impossible to identify the corpse.
Answer:
sooo. im pretty sure he likes you. maybe start talking to him. try to be friends with him. ask him his number or snap so you guys can talk on there
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
