Lets do process of elimination!
A. Breaking glass - That is a psychical change because if you break it, it is still glass. It didn't change to another substance.
B. Melting ice on a windshield - During the melting process, there is no chemical change, and therefore, no new substance is created.
C. Burning gasoline - When gas burns it usually combines with oxygen to give carbon dioxide, water etc. It is a chemical change.
D. Denting a bumper - The bumper is still a bumper, only thing is it has a dent in it. The properties did not change, meaning no chemical change.
Unfortunately you did not specify the electronic configuration in the question, however since one of the answers must be a halogen, i took the liberty to attach an image with the configuration (both the simple numeric and spdf form) for all the halogen and all you have to do is match the electronic configuration you have in your question to the one in the table attached and you can then deduce the answer.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
P2≈393.609Kpa so I think the answer is 394 kPa
Explanation:
PV=mRT Ideal Gas Law
m and R are constant because they dont change for the problem. That means
PV/T=mR = constant
so P1*V1/T1=P2*V2/T2 and note that the temperatures are in absolute temperatures (Kelvin) because you can't divide by zero.
So P2 = P1*V1*T2/(V2*T1) = 101325 Pa * 700 mL * 303K/(200 mL*273K)
P2 = 393609 Pa
Answer:
Height = 1.9493 cm
Width = 1.9493 cm
Depth = 1.9493 cm
Solution:
Data Given:
Mass = 20 g
Density = 2.7 g/mL
Step 1: Calculate the Volume,
As,
Density = Mass ÷ Volume
Or,
Volume = Mass ÷ Density
Putting values,
Volume = 20 g ÷ 2.7 g/mL
Volume = 7.407 mL or 7.407 cm³
Step 2: Calculate Dimensions of the Cube:
As we know,
Volume = length × width × depth
So, we will take the cube root of 7.407 cm³ which is 1.9493 cm.
Hence,
Volume = 1.9493 cm × 1.9493 cm × 1.9493 cm
Volume = 7.407 cm³
Answer:
The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).
Explanation:
- Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
- Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.
Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.
