People engage in trade mostly in order to......

An important insight that can be drawn from the research on happiness is that:

Ahat [919]

Answer:

The best answer to the question: An important insight that can be drawn from the research on happiness is that:___, would be, C: Objective realities are not as important as subjective feelings.

Explanation:

For a very long time, different fields of study, especially in the social sciences, have become interested in learning about what happiness is, how it is defined, what defines it, and what makes people perceive themselves as happy and what factors of life, both inside a person, and outside, play a role in the perception of happiness. Although happiness is essentially a very subjective and intangible concept, and its perception varies from one person to another, what studies on happiness have found though are certain common denominators among people who perceive themselves as happy, or unhappy. One such common denominator is the role that objective realities: having money, having a good job, a country doing well, play on the perception of happiness vs. subjective feelings. And the conclusions that have been drawn show that people perceive happiness more from subjective feelings than from objective realities, meaning, happiness in part depends on a person´s feelings, rather than what is measurable, tangible, and objective.

6 0

4 years ago

Dr. Bradley, a therapist, attempts to improve the quality of life of his clients by prescribing drugs like antipsychotics and an

kumpel [21]

Answer:

A. biomedical therapy.

Explanation:

Biomedical therapy: The term biomedical therapy represents the aim of reworking and treating an individual's brain functioning. Biomedical therapy is a branch that comes under mental health phenomenon.

An individual who practices biomedical therapies focuses on helping patients or clients with psychological disorders and physiological symptoms by using various drugs, psychosurgery, and electroconvulsive treatment.

Biomedical therapy includes medical procedure or/and medication to treat psychological disorders.

In the question above, Dr Bradley practices biomedical therapy.

4 0

4 years ago

In 1950, approximately how many U.S. households owned a television? a. <1% c. 19% b. 9% d. 90% Please select the best answer

Lelechka [254]

Answer: B

Explanation: In 1950, television was a quite new thing. Computing systems were also in the beginning of its own industry and technology was finally at its earliest awake. To prove how fast technology was, in 1959, almost 90 percent of the people now owned televisions.

P

I hope this helps

5 0

2 years ago

Defend the point of view that government is not necessary. Support your statement with specific reasons.

sergejj [24]

Answer:

Government is predicated upon the initiation of force. For example, if you were to stop paying your taxes, you would get a letter from the IRS saying you owe such and such amount. They would keep sending you these letters for a while, but eventually they would send a group of men with badges and guns to throw you in a cage for not giving this institution YOUR money.

Courts are often crowded because of overcriminalization (prosecuting individuals for victimless crimes) and there is no price associated with criminal cases. Cases often get plea bargained because prosecutors have an incentive to have high conviction rates, not to serve their clients since they are paid by the state. This often means that crimes that are easier to prosecute get more attention.

Also you have the current problem where people sue each other willy nilly. This problem could be solved by simply requiring the person who brings suit to pay for the defendant's legal expenses if the defendant is proven innocent of any wrongdoing.

Also the victim of a crime in our current system gets screwed twice. Once by the offender who perpetrated the crime, then again by the state, which confiscates his wealth in order to pay for the prosecution and housing of the criminal. Historically private law was centered around compensating the victim financially.

In absence of a state professional judges would emerge that would make decisions based on a commonly established practices which could be codified into a law book. This would be analogous to how dictionaries codify definitions for words, you don’t need a central body to come up with new words and definitions, language emerges spontaneously. So too, law would be established in this way and in fact this is what English common law is based on, communal law that was established and accepted by the community. Similarly customs would emerge for the amount of times you can appeal, based on the crime committed.

Private law would solve many of the above problems listed. It would eliminate overcriminalization (it would be unlikely that someone would bring suit against someone for using drugs), it would focus on restitution and lawyers would be working for the victims instead of simply working for a high conviction rate.

8 0

4 years ago

"Interview with a Soldier" - Write a script of 20 questions from an interviewer and possible answers from WW I soldier. You must

Setler79 [48]

Answer:

What is your name? For married women, what was your maiden name?

Age?

Where were you born and raised?

What was your family background? Educational background?

What is your current occupation? Current address?

At the time of the war, were you in a relationship, married, or single?

What was your spouse's or partner's name and wartime occupation (if interviewed for that reason)?

If married, when and where were you married?

Did you have children at any time during the war?

Where did you live/work during the war?

What was your main wartime activity?

Were you employed outside the home?

In industry?

Why did you choose that activity?

What kind of training were you given?

What was your title?

What kind of activities did you perform?

Who was your supervisor?

What was your specialty at work?

What did you like and dislike about it?

What special rules or conventions did you have to follow?

With whom did you work?

If you had children, was there child care at work?

If not, what arrangements did you make?

Were you unionized?

Were you an organizer?

How did you feel about the unions?

Did you develop friendships during training or the activity itself?

Did you have family and friends in the service or doing war work?

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago