Answer:
Empathy
Explanation:
Empathy is the term of positive psychology. Empathy is an experience about another person's grief, pain from the self point of view. Empathy is a behavior that promotes pro-social behavior and as well as helping behavior that arises from inner.
Empathy is in contrast with sympathy. Sympathy is cognitively to make understand other person feeling of pain, grief, etc. Empathy is like when people behave in a very compassionate manner. All individuals have different views about the person who is pain. The psychopath has a feeling of empathy but does not have experiential. A true psychopath does not have a feeling of empathy.
SO that when Mark's father died. Her friend told her he can understand her pain which she is going through. When she cries her friend also cry with her. It is an example of empathy.
Confucius and The Golden Rule. Much of the writing of the famous Chinese philosopher Confucius is about human relationships. He argued that respect and responsibilities should flow in both directions in any relationship. We learned that Confucius wrote one of the earliest versions of the Golden Rule: Do to others as you would have them do to you.
Answer:
recover damages
Explanation:
From the explanation above,we can deduce or conclude that this is a clear case of fraud in which the aforementioned parties which are Don(victim)a and Eve(perpetrator) of this case of fraud.
First and foremost,we should have an idea of what fraud means or connotes-It is an intentional or purposeful act deception by a individual(s) or body as the case may be towards another individual(s) or entity for the purpose of financial or material gains,not minding the medium in which it was portrayed.And it centres around lies,in order to convince or confuse the victim as the case maybe.
So in this case,Eve having lied to Don about having access to a stock-trading algorithm which could multiply an investment and thus,it wasn't so,then Don would have to file a suit and a proof of injury is required to recover damages in order to void the contract and get back money paid earlier on the basis of the contract,instead of affirming the contract because no sort of financial gains were made in the stock-trading transaction.
A reasonable disagreement with a US Government policy. Explanation- not all of us agree on the way our Government works and how Presidents are elected but that doesn’t change or threaten our daily life.
Answer:
the jurors discuss the case
Explanation:
