Answer:
the limitation of his investigation is amount of involvement that he can have.
Explanation:
By choosing a descriptive investigation method, the student is limited to creating a highly detailed description of the bacteria but cannot investigate and answer the more important questions such as how to grow the bacteria. An experimental investigation would allow the student to test different methods of growing the bacteria and compare them to see which one is actually the most effective. Thus the limitation of his investigation is amount of involvement that he can have.
Progressives are experts in such linguistic deeds. And while conservatives and even libertarians too, and unfortunately, use several trivial phrases instead of solid arguments, progressives are the undefeated champions in this regard. The best proof of this is the very progressive term they use so excessively: when they refer to a measure they support, it is progressive; when they oppose something, it is reactionary.
This simple dichotomy is an enormous pleasure for those individuals incapable of a more elaborate reasoning and who like to see their beliefs summarized in simple buzzwords, almost always partisan and rudimentary.
Walter Rauschenbusch was a theologian focused on the social responsibility of Christians, having challenged churches to get involved in topics such as industrialization, poverty, unemployment, justice and criminality. He insisted that the gospel cannot be alienated from the social consequences of faith.
I'm not sure what era of wars you're referring to, but I can give you a fairly general answer.
War on land tends to be more difficult due to the terrain. There are mountains and valleys, soldiers have to walk great distances to get to their destination if their vehicles cannot handle the landscape, and there's always the possibility of guerrilla warfare (hiding in the bushes, attacking and running away) from the other army.
While war at sea can be treacherous, it also lends itself to finding the target easier. Water tends to try to remain level, so there aren't any hills or valleys to contend with, and a telescope can see for miles on the open sea.
If you can give a specific war you're referring to, I could try and give you a more specific answer.
<span />
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania hosted the Constitutional Convention from May 14 to September 17, 1787. Choosing America's future government was the main goal of the event. Many of the delegates had considerably more ambitious ambitions than the ostensible purpose of the Convention, which was to amend the current Articles of Confederation.
Write a 250-word essay that argues your opinion about the constitutional convention.
In May 1787, delegates from every state—aside from Rhode Island—met in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for a convention. The Articles of Confederation were to be rejected in favor of a new constitution, it was agreed at this gathering, which became known as the Constitutional Convention. In addition to completely rejecting the Articles of Confederation, the fifty-five delegates who gathered in Philadelphia between May 25 and September 17, 1787, would draft the first written constitution for a country in the history of the globe. The Constitution established unique governmental principles and procedures such as checks and balances, the division of powers among the branches, and the definition of those powers. The amendment process also transformed the Constitution into a living document that could be altered with sufficient popular support and state ratification. The government can first be constrained by the constitution by identifying or enumerating its powers. No authority not expressly granted or listed to the government may be assumed by it. Second, it is possible to split the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the government. Two Congressional legislative bodies were established by the Great Compromise. V!rginia (big state) and New Jersey (little state) plans were united in the agreement, which is also known as the Sherman Compromise or the Connecticut Compromise. Roger Sherman, a delegate from Connecticut, advocated a "bicameral" or two-chambered Congress, with each state receiving two seats in the upper chamber and a number of representatives in the lower chamber (the House) according to its population (the Senate).
Learn more about constitutional convention: brainly.com/question/11662939
#SPJ4
The Goldeb rule is "Treat others the way you wanna be treated"
