In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
Explanation:
just add all the 3 average time together then dived all of them in the nxt box
Answer:
A the first one
Explanation:
it will affect small farmers I think
1. There are people who speak different languages.
2. It is made up of several city-states countries.
Answer:
Avoidant Personality Disorder
Explanation:
The children exhibit the symptoms of avoidant personality disorder due to disapproval, criticism, and rejection from parents. The children avoid a public situation in which they might experience disapproval or rejection. The parental acceptance, rejection, punishment, or overly authoritative control adversely affect the personality and performance of the child. Consequently, they feel fear to take part in the challenges of life.