Answer:
d. A and B
Explanation:
The Progressive Era was a period of widespread social activism and political reform across the United States that spanned the 1890's to the 1920's. According to my research on the progressive era, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this meant a rise in union activism and a loss of personal autonomy for skilled working under scientific management.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Hthrheieeyjrrvsveeveveveveveg
Most economists consider 5% to be acceptable.
Answer:
South America's predominant democratic regimes and its increasing interdependence on regional trade have not precluded the emergence of militarized crises between Colombia and Venezuela or the revival of boundary claims between Chile and Peru. This way, how can we characterize a zone that, in spite of its flourishing democracy and dense economic ties, remain involved in territorial disputes for whose resolution the use of force has not yet been discarded? This article contends that existing classifications of zones of peace are not adequate to explain this unusual coexistence. Thus, its main purpose is to develop a new analytical category of regional peace for assessing this phenomenon: the hybrid peace. It aims to research the evolution of security systems in South America during the previous century and build a new, threefold classification of peace zones: negative peace zones, hybrid peace zones, and positive peace zones.
Explanation:
mark me brainliest
