Answer:
Feb. 2021
Dr Gift Card Liability $20
Cr Gift Card Revenue $20
(to record revenue arisen from oustanding Gift Card Liability)
Explanation:
Under GAAP, the accounting for Gift Card is quite simple. When the gift card are sold, Gift Card Issuer receives Cash (Debit Cash) and assume the Liability (Cr Liability) to anyone owning the gift card for later providing of goods/services priced at the Cash amount that had been received.
It is not until Gift Card is redeemed that Gift Card Issuer is allowed to record revenue (Credit Revenue) as it is an actual point of time when the provide of goods/services takes place. Also at the same time, once the goods/services are provided, they Liability assumed earlier in time through Gift Card issuance will be discharged to the extent of the price of goods/services provided.
Answer:
The approximate yield to maturity is 9.43%.
Explanation:
Fees charge = 2%
Investment worth = $500,000
Amount due = 2/100 * 500,000 = 10,000
The amount Andrew will receive as compensation is $10,000.
Answer:
(i) $14,000
(ii) $32,000
(iii) $10,000
Explanation:
Cost of the machine that is recorded in the books of accounts is the total cost incurred to make the machine useful and useable.
Cost for each machine:
= amount paid for the assets + installation costs + renovation cost prior to use.
Therefore,
Cost of Machine A = 11,000 + 500 + 2,500
= $14,000
Cost of Machine B = 30,000 + 1,000 + 1,000
= $32,000
Cost of Machine C = 8000 + 500 + 1500
= $10,000
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
