Answer:
The answer is that women in Sparta had more rights than women in Athens as well. Spartan women could inherit property while Athenian women had no such rights. Spartan women had the right to own wealth and property. ... In contrary to Spartan, Athenian women could not own property in their own right. ---No explanation.---
The correct answer is the following.
It seems that there is no question here, just a series of statements.
Although there is no question included, we could assume that we have to choose the sentence best written. If that is the case, then the correct option is E) The pace at which technological innovations such as the internet have proliferated may seem unique to the 21st century, but the industrial revolution provided an explosion of new technology that
Among the other options, option E is more concrete, understandable, and specific. It does not need anything else. It starts correctly, refers to the modern technological innovations and set the example of the internet, and compare it with the case of the industrial revolution in which similar advances surged in that time, allowing the progress of nations.
The clearest, direct, and specific the sentence, the better to a correct understanding.
Answer: They both have common interests such as understanding human social and cultural diversity.
Explanation: They both arose from a common project, so they are kind of similar.
Answer:
Explanation: If in a way it can be compared since both in Benin and in the South of the United States, the conditions of the slaves were the same: "lousy". The treatment of Africans and African Americans was inhuman. Francisco Félix de Souza was dealing with slaves and was a faithful servant of Guezo in order to defeat his brother, King Adondazan, who ruled in Dahomey, as Benin was formerly known.
He was good for some Romans, but bad for others. The optimates who opposed him in the Civil Wars certainly held a negative view. The people generally loved him, but he made too many powerful enemies in the Senate. Caesar was a great general and an inspirational leader, but he proved to be a very naive politician.
