Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Longevity is very complex, so only athletic status is not enough to understand it. Athletic status is a good sign that a person is likely to have more years of life because it is a sign of health. However, this does not serve as a universal parameter. Some people may have athletic status and be sick. Researchers suggest that understanding a person's ability to live longer requires understanding their lifestyle, such as diet, exercise routine, reading, daily stress level, and more.
<span>If you want to have just one map wherein all the information
you require about a certain place and its political make-up it would be an
advantage to just have it all in one map since all the information you needs is
all there. This comes handy when you want
to travel light. However, if you want to
be more specific in what you need to find then it’s best to place the physical
and political elements of the maps or makes separate maps for each element. It makes it easier to read especially when
you are looking for a specific element.</span>
Yes because if we look at the two party system there are lots of flaws in it essentially the minorities voices are less heard because if their values don’t align with anyone then they may choose to not vote which causes a low voter turnout since i’d say the two main parties have pretty big differences in views especially depending on the leader of the party, if they went to proportional representation like sweden everyone’s voices would be heard and it would be easier to make decisions and a higher voting turnout because more party’s to choose from so it would give plurality to the system.
Answer: Juanita is what Kellerman would call <u>an activist</u> follower.
Explanation:
Activists are very committed, invest heavily in people and processes, and are eager to show their support or opposition.
In addition, <u>current followers are influenced by a range of cultural and technological changes</u> that affect what they want and how they perceive and communicate with their supposed leaders.
Kellerman explores the evolving dynamics between leaders and subordinates, and offers a typology that executives can use to determine and appreciate how their followers are different from each other. U<em>sing the level of commitment to a leader or group as a defining facto</em>r, the author classifies followers into five types.
