I think it is scale
Scale is the ground distance over map distance
The sentence describes a cause of the decline of the Roman Republic: A.There was a shortage of labor after a slave rebellion
<h3>Explanation:
</h3>
The Roman Republic is the era of classical Roman civilization, it beginning with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC and ends in 27 BC. Whereas The Roman Empire is the ancient Rome post-Republican period that consist of large territorial holdings around the Mediterranean sea in Europe, North Africa and West Asia. The difference between the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire was primarily one of a patina of democracy versus outright dictatorship
A slave rebellion is an armed uprising by slaves. It have occurred in nearly all societies that practice slavery in the past. A desire for freedom is the greatest objects of song, art, and culture amongst the enslaved population. It is an armed uprising by slaves and occurred in nearly all societies that practice slavery or have practiced slavery in the past.
The decline of the Roman Republic caused by a shortage of labor after a slave rebellion. A labour shortage itself is an economic condition where the employers believe that there are insufficient qualified candidates to fill the marketplace demands for employment
Learn more about the Roman Republic:
brainly.com/question/4710581
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: The federal government should be stronger than state governments.
Explanation:
The Federalists were a group of important intellectuals and lawmakers, which formed in 1787 to support and spread their belief that the 13 American states needed to unite under the same flag and grant more power to the federal government, while keeping their power as well. The Federalists believed there should be a federal Constitution in place (which later became the American Constitution), which would protect American citizens no matter what state they came from. Basically, the Federalists argued for the creation of a higher government structure, which would ensure respect for fundamental rights, and less power to the state governments. The Federalists called for a strong national government.
ON NOVEMBER 13, 2016, THE Sunday after the election of Donald Trump, I stepped into the pulpit of St. Barnabas Memorial Church in Falmouth, Massachusetts, to preach. I do this two or three times a month, but it’s fair to say I approached my homiletical responsibility differently that Sunday. The months since November 2016 have buffeted us with report after report of scandal, violence, injustice, and deceit, so it may be worth remembering just what those five days between Tuesday, November 8, and Sunday, November 13, looked and felt like in the United States. At DeWitt Junior High, in my home state of Michigan, white students formed a wall outside the school and barred entry to any student of color. The white students said they were making America great again. A toy doll with brown skin had string tied around its neck and was hanged inside an elevator at Canisius College in Buffalo, New York. At Wellesley College in Massachusetts, students of color were spat upon while entering and exiting the multicultural student center. At San Diego State, a Muslim student was assaulted and her hijab torn from her head. There are many other examples.
These things saddened and frightened me, and as I climbed to the pulpit, I knew I must address them. The question, of course, was not if I should preach about politics, but how, and that question persists months later. Since early 2016 we have been told over and again by pundits and historians alike that our (continuing, unending) political moment is one of absolute singularity, one entirely without precedent. No one has ever campaigned like this, governed like this, spoken like this, lied like this, boasted like this, tweeted like this. So how should one preach in response to all this? What should political preaching look like in the age of Donald Trump? That is one question. But I want to ask a different, related, and perhaps more important one. In the age of Donald Trump, I do not want to ask how one should preach about politics. I want to ask: what will the politics of preaching itself be?
