The functions of noun phrases in a sentence include the following:
- They serve as the objects or the verb subjects in the sentence.
- They function as a group of words that denote predicates.
- They complement prepositions in sentences.
<h3>What are noun phrases?</h3>
Noun phrases are groups of words that are not nouns but can act like nouns in sentences. Examples of words that can be described as noun phrases are; his, this, her, my, their, one, three, five, some, enough,etc.
They are classified into determiners, numerals, and possessive determiners. One of the examples of possessive determiners stated above is "their." Since nouns function as the subject in sentences, noun phrases can also function the same way.
Another way in which noun phrases can be used in sentences is when they function as complements to the prepositions. Numerals are identified as numbers and the figures mentioned above show ways in which numerals identify as noun phrases.
Learn more about noun phrases here:
brainly.com/question/26047758
#SPJ1
Answer:
we need the story once you the story I'll answer. ok.
Explanation:
The Correct choice is <u>a</u><u>dverb</u> <u>phrase</u> .
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which statement provides supporting evidence for why the Compromise of 1850 between the North and South failed? would be: Northerners became strong opponents of the strengthened Fugitive Slave Act, which was part of the compromise.
Explanation:
The great Compromise of 1850, between the states of the North and those of the South, was the only way that it was possible to finally reach an end to miliary confrontation and the idea of retiring from the Union, after the Civil War. However, despite the fact that this Compromise was reached through a lot of negotiations between the two sides, there were several points on which both did not agree, and in the end, these oppositions made the whole pact fail. But none of the points against the Compromise was ever more potent in bringing the whole thing down, than the infamous Fugitive Slave Law, under which, the North agreed to return all escaped slaves to their former owners in the South. This was something the North did not agree to really, and in the end they never enforced it.
Answer:
To Diana George, poverty is represented by non-profit organizations such Habitat for Humanity in a way of despair, or something that can be easily seen or recognized. Or in the case of this organization and many others, it tries as to find an surfire way to make others empathise with poverty. The problems George identifies as a result of this tactic is that poverty is not always easily recognized, and on even questions that “If it doesn’t look like poverty, then how do we adress it?” (p. 450) The largest, most pressing issue is that seeing poverty in one way instead limits our understanding on how to deal with poverty.
At the very beginning of the article, George creates an anecdote of how she encounters charities. It details her going through her mail and looking over many other poverty organization’s mail. This shows their tactic, of presenting poverty as grim and ragged, while a quote from bell hooks before that states that seeing poverty in one way challenges how people look and deal with it. Providing these two largely contrasting viewpoints, in a way, makes them appeal to different audiences by expressing both her issue and a counterclaim to structure the remainder of textual analysis.
The purpose of George’s textual analysis is to ultimately show that representing poverty as weak and depraving only hinders the fight against it instead of resolving it. Everyday, it’s a question of who is poor and who is not, but that itself is becoming increasingly difficult to tell. This rudimentary mindset eventually leads George to state that “There are certainly many cultural and political reasons for these problems…but I would suggest that the way the way poverty countinues to be represented in this country and on tapes limits our understanding.” So if people continue to see poverty in this sight, the ones that are poor but still have a home or job will challenge this belief. People will not know how to deal with them, and this essentially why George criticizes non-profit organizations such as Health for Habitat
