The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice.
The differences of their salaries is that t<span>he bassoonists earn a higher salary than the flutists.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
$1,076,000
Explanation:
The computation of the carrying value of the bonds is shown below:
= Face value of the bond + unamortized bond premium
= $1,060,000 + $16,000
= $1,076,000
We simply added the face value of the bond and the unamortized bond premium so that the carrying value of the bond could come
All other information which is given is not relevant. hence, ignored it
Answer:
Cost of external equity= 26.9%
Explanation
<em>According to the dividend valuation, the value of a stock is the present value of expected future dividends discounted at the required rate of return.</em>
The model can me modified to determined the cost of equity having flotation cost as follows:
Ke = D(1+r )/P(1-f) + g
Ke= Cost of equity
D- current dividend,
D(1+g) - dividend next year
p- price of stock - 31,00$
f - flotation cost - 14%
g- growth rate - 7%
Ke= 5.30/31× (1-0.14) + 0.07
= 0.2687997 × 100
= 26.9%
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
- Breach of duty.
- Strict liability.
- Recklessness.
- Negligence per se
And this is the correct answer:
Explanation:
Negligence per se consist in act that is neglectful, or unlawful, because it explicitely violates a statue or regulation.
In this case, the statue was the new state law that required smoke detectors to be maintained. The company that installed the smoke detector inside Jose's house clearly did not maintain the detector because otherwise, it would have gone off when the fire started, and Jose probably would not have died.
It is a negligence per se from the smoke detector company, and Jose's wife can lawfully sue them for that very reason.
Answer:
Answer is option a, i.e. trade-offs and connections may differ in short run and the long run.
Explanation:
Keynes' law in economics and Say's law in economics are contradictory in their perspective. Where Keynes' law says that it is the demand that creates the supply, on the other hand, Say's law states that its the supply that tends to create the demand. But, we cannot neglect any of the above facts as demand and supply cant operate independently. So, on combining the two laws, we happen to take both the given laws into account. Also, it is found that Keynes' law is more appropriate and accurate for the short-run whereas, Say's law is for the long run. This thus creates trade-offs and connections that differ in the short-run and long-run by affecting the three important goals of macroeconomics, i.e. higher standard of living, low inflation, and low unemployment.
