disadvantage is that the land lord can raise the rent easily while you can not do anything about it.Lower insurance, When renting a home, we would most likely restricted to make any modification that we like to the home. (such as we are not allowed to change the color of the paint)
On the insurance front, renting a home has cheaper insurance since we are only paying for the protection of the personal goods that we keep on the home. We do not have to pay for property tax since the home is not belong to us.
But a benefit is that there is no mortgage.
Answer:
c. No; the facts of this situation do not provide reasonable grounds for a stop and search. Any attempt to do so by store security could result in a claim of false imprisonment.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question above, store security has no right to stop and search for Jeff. Therefore, the letter c is the most correct answer to this question.
Jeff's actions in the store do not provide sufficient reasons for there to be any kind of stop and research, as the facts in the situation do not provide enough information about an illegal act, so if store security forces a situation there could be legal damage to the store .
Therefore, it is essential that stores adopt a theft prevention strategy, with an effective security system and a team prepared to carry out correct approaches.
Answer:
Statements "A" is true.
Explanation:
During a financial recession and a cynical domain, the yield spread between government securities and corporate securities could be higher than during great monetary occasions. This is because the grounds that during a recession, corporate securities would convey more hazard, (for example, higher default chance) than during great monetary occasions. To make up for this extra hazard, financial specialists would request more returns.
Answer:
$12.22 per share
Explanation:
The computation of the stock price one year from now is shown below;
Current EPS = Net Income ÷ Number of shares
= $95,000,000/5,500,000
= $17.2727
Now
P/E Ratio = Market Price per share ÷ Earnings per share
= $14.75 ÷ 17.2727
= 0.8539 times
Now
Revised EPS = $95,000,000 × 1.25 ÷ 8,300,000
= $14.3072
So, the Price is
= 14.3072 × 0.8539
= $12.22 per share
Answer: 3. a motion to dismiss.
Explanation:
When a party believes that a case has no legal basis, in other words the party does not believe that what they did warrants a court case, they would file a motion to dismiss so as not to waste resources fighting something they see as frivolous.
In this case, NuProducts is essentially filing a motion to dismiss when they say that they did nothing wrong according to the law. They would prefer if the courts simply dismissed the case so that they would not incur costs to fight the case.
