Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Answer:
The second wish was that they wished their son alive again.
Third wish: He wished for his son to be dead again
Explanation:
Sorry I only know part of the first and second question
This is false. I hope this chart helps you :)
Answer:
Both eventually come to an end or die.
Explanation:
"The Coming Of Night" is a poem written by Linda Pastan. The poem is about how the speaker accepts the inevitability of death. The them of the poem is death.
A simile is a rhetoric device thaat is used to compare two unlike things or objects or ideas.
<u>In the poem, Pastan has compared the ambition with the 'pilot light.' It is important to know that the 'pilot light' is an important instrument to run an appliance. So, by comparing life's ambition with 'pilot light', the poet is making a point that just like the pilot light is vital to run appliances, ambitions are important to run a life. Which means that the poet is conveying a message that a life without an ambition is likely to end just as a 'faulty pilot light' will come to an end</u>.
This comparison helps in the contribution to the central idea oof how life slowly ends without an ambition, just like a faulty pilot light.
