Answer:Present evidence that contradicts your stance, and then argue against (refute) that evidence and therefore strengthen your position.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. My mum is easy to talk to. Talk to (b) <u>her</u>.
2. My dad's great. You'll love (e) <u>him</u>.
3. We're lost. Can you help (d) <u>us</u>?
4. Listen, I've got something to tell (c) <u>you</u>.
5. Beata has got five dogs. She really loves (a) <u>them</u>.
6. Hey, Jack - I need to talk to (g) <u>you</u>.
7. This is a great CD. What is (f)<u> it</u>?
Explanation:
I have been able to match the sentences to their object pronouns.
Object pronouns are known to be those pronouns that replaces noun in a sentence and are the objects that receive the action in that sentence.
In a sentence, if the object pronouns replace nouns, the nouns they replace cannot be the subject of that sentence. These object pronouns are known to be personal pronouns which are used as grammatical object. They are used as the direct or indirect object of a verb or can be used as the object of a preposition.
Some examples are <em>me, you, him, her, us, it,</em> etc.
The answer is C
"me" is a first person pronoun :)
This uses A. non-sequitur logic.
This is because the second inference does not rely upon the first. Just because someone likes the <em>Star Wars</em> movies does not mean that they also like the <em>Harry Potter </em>movies. These are two unrelated things, so a person does not automatically like both. <span />
