Answer:
hello there...
you know BODMAS for sure
First brackets then of then divi then multi then add and then subtract
going by BODMAS
we need to first of all multiply of -6 and 3
hence ans is multiplying -6 and 3
( option 1 Is wrong by the equation u sent if the equation is correct then ans is which given bur by options I think equation is wrong becoz I don't see divide symbol)
Answer:
(21, 17 )
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the midpoint formula and equating to the coordinates of the midpoint.
Let endpoint 2 have coordinates (x, y ), then
0.5(x - 3) = 9 ( multiply both sides by 2 )
x - 3 = 18 ( add 3 to both sides )
x = 21
and
0.5(y - 5) = 6 ( multiply both sides by 2 )
y - 5 = 12 ( add 5 to both sides )
y = 17
endpoint 2 = (21, 17 )
Answer: A is the right angle
Step-by-step explanation:
a. 20^2 + 15^2 = 25^2
400 + 225 = 625
625 = 625
hope this helps :)
Answer:
The table should measure diagonally about 41.23 inches.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the diagonal of a rectangle we use the formula :
+ =
A and B both represent the side lengths of the rectangle, while C is the diagonal part. Knowing this formula, let's plug in the values for A and B and see what happens.
+ =
1024 + 676 =
1700 =
The square root of 1700 is (rounded to the hundreth's place) = 41.23
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
Step-by-step explanation:
This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:
-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7
Multiply all parts by 2.
-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14
Add 5 to all parts.
-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19
Divide all parts by 3.
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...
|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0
Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.
__
For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...
|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤
If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:
|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0
Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.