Interesting question
Usually when you look at something like that construction, you think that AB has been bisected by PQ and that the two segments are perpendicular. They are perpendicular but nowhere is that stated. So the answer is C because all the other answers are wrong.
PQ is congruent AB is not correct. As long as the arcs are equal and meet above and below AB there is no proof of congruency. In your mind widen the compass legs so that they are wider than AB and redraw the arcs. You get a larger PQ, but it has all the original properties of PQ except size.
PQ is not congruent to AQ. How would you prove conguency? You'd have to put both lines into triangles that can be proved congruent. It can't be done.
The two lines are not parallel. They are perpendicular. That can be proven. They meet at right angles to each other (also provable).
Answer:
38,674.This area represents the increase in population over a 10-year period.
Step-by-step explanation:
When graphed over the interval 0 ≤ t ≤ 10, the birth rate is more than the death rate. This means the area between the two curves is the amount of births subtract the amount of deaths. This results in an area which means the increase of the population.
The birth rate is graphed in green and the death rate is graphed in blue.
To find the area, take the integral of the difference of the functions:
If you are evaluating the answer is -41
Maybe c or A not completely sure try looking for the one you think it is and try reading it again
If you simplify this expression you get 2x 2 -7x -2
